From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.218.43 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793904275; b=jnHNx2O6qkzDx8NsOrIipnWxNLCX79j+mz85QE+aAz8jlJX6hKtbsMq9C9+CmpsG55vF 2QCSBdJmkKTblwf3+Ysof9iMUs03kXBJ0fuiq6OKBHGzflBuIF3jg8mvPC/7Q0zgXCfwm 8NHilCfXp6uMoPq2NgKUpA56axeIk9kygI5XKuT8aRQ4fu9IaXeYasW1LZQHr0oB3R2S7 4htopIyidCz3SMz8qRAUauNDeh3JQ4zqACfzSstzkWs1pVTTtoojm0rX7oQUiZqjcW4Gk yV4ZCFrZrHF6XTHHUPad67VGwXppyeAYDfyJY2f1T4IDaaQbzpemIHYcstqTWnjMkvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793904275; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: From:X-Google-Original-From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=R3MeO5bU9u9vZq0BWi1LFpN7YGyhm0gURVRh2ZqhZrE=; b=3X8AorGQhqtyqtNmVCErh7M5k21+4BXd5ObN1Umlse1MUODKJa6Zgj0KCbim16G/zLg/ YdzWI6gLWZNk6DilU0ua5JuOiZvx1GGPPVm78wpwHr4tO1jktsWHr/aq1AaTrb7o/eukN 1NdzcdgPmNrTCQqk+A6I8WagHw2ghl7B1viizmDDbrRGYbzHR5PTUcDMNV0PNk1Zo6bcB h05W6Whxq41z4wlTa4mZcl73ZpzMI7Iv6vAU1nCjmLtIVRZWUFT6TG3zcDgbouUwkZfq5 CrZ0ZJGzTRwrVgAHw7I1kbyNF8wIeX/j88JwPc0PyHfuwmap7SGimYJGhkWltRL9J3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=e0yO+Yt1; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.218.43 Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com (mail-ej1-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5DDC606A32C for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 18:44:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org E5DDC606A32C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=e0yO+Yt1 Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c49b431f022so102077466b.1 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 10:44:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20260707; t=1793904273; x=1794509073; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=R3MeO5bU9u9vZq0BWi1LFpN7YGyhm0gURVRh2ZqhZrE=; b=e0yO+Yt1X9dK5zUWtqluc01kM8rGMGf1AjxO5Vx4oz11JObBFSGNEtaZoL0SyWsUqS QbUys7570/8D8S2wooUCG2fa83MBkuMwT4+81BD2e8XBtMDQHw7jmJNoNWVqhN4H5WrJ o4RjOc3YgikXkNbNIA375TNF0wptj9v6u13xV750RZBb5gXKbevXpRbMMrZbCI2M43/h fyVEKdY06hsmqXxDbi/h8x/t4KnPya55oFcQvnNY/ZrG3Vi50pBhuvLXE9oX8M8vGADU rv7jJP/d98piUPYaBt7FIAAcKsouzDpcJ7CjFebfr1McSyjYGPjKA4X7mNjtTFVa4oCm ehHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1793904273; x=1794509073; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=R3MeO5bU9u9vZq0BWi1LFpN7YGyhm0gURVRh2ZqhZrE=; b=Hd29WgpbD4DQFNoXH04kON4L1faLH50tLU7Ceaz9mfAgmGgnu6LSYV884LM5G0CYLb 9Kzj/vbmX4TAakgtNGWvyfuwjS77o7aHE74lOd96Q51qtkeeqhBBKJUdpjgX7MViWJ21 J/GiutE93USMdsyNFQwslt9lftI9C369HnEaQnXBvMbaMXM7KrEzosy8IE2OteYbL0JN /NDEa12Z6HYhxEyN99ftqaHr3hIeABhRcaLgYRBg02WUF4inSboFAziAMWBXmPRzRQ67 757LqEJ8CC6F3uAX7kfw3Ic5x+jIcIF7FM+zGd60NKIk1tVWWlsNX1A6ox2x69Q9lUs2 8rVA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxHK9D/DpxVWSoGA2Cn18PGcsaNg8O6ghk5SVqQF/j9iNGNkq/iAyFwRb5+vIQ5Xjshysc36Cf3i27n2do=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: APuU4Z8Uo/VVmuBfOv+EqVFX7IDo+7EHa5rVJSyiVKSt/pg/VuiQG1lS wSjZpIZIka9jxWApuMxqxccPRl78iciZUKWlbwEB+Y0X7UIiBdH3w/6v X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2aW1UDHWGA+WmsFVGdEpu6PUEXitLpwzLl+VJj0tk/78+K3N4Kv0o4SrMIOIh vD4ga+9CQSKJ/8F0x4RBurNCJkuwGB8g5Gz4QAWjTGjC6SoBa/CSWPDjULpDo5Vv0MSbEnEmC6c 7XofumAKhGYd5oSL+lNqIMIngtn4I8vXZsqMUoufq58yNGsu7YYliuk5lPZJ454lrJQuWSc7HOb PWTnVhn7x2MrvQuzW8736B695bT1ar83vsMBs4AhaznpEdNgu/dabGOgMznd/YKMVR4fbXegb9O ZI52ojtewUh0Dy5Leo+W7GpzNzufHDT4DEeNCPXbZiQF7SoD8wKI6uck/wIFoaUPkY//a9w203l PiNxfH8DhTh+Xduc5psgr67Leg5zRuYTWOuXLn6v4s15IXqnAH2kDZ8MljKQPDICR5pIuGoNrSW 1ktoy7E5pyzq/Pyhdb7W3eFzvV/Q2Nq+3JvOnIxkQsme47WssYVAfXWYErPKxaRlSkBQGJ2fQDz +TpxNpe14EegeKTQjc6g82YNxYFll5/gza4jMcUHvBcFrVi0P8MiZI8gs8LlXofZ2Rs X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d0f:b0:c48:a838:c188 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c4d34c59db0mr39140466b.13.1793904272964; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 10:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from milan ([2001:9b1:d5a0:a500::24b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-c4d354ac249sm8993666b.5.2026.11.05.10.44.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Nov 2026 10:44:32 -0800 (PST) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 19:44:30 +0100 To: Herbert Xu Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , Linus Torvalds , "Liam R. Howlett (Google)" , Davidlohr Bueso , Michal Hocko , Baoquan He , Alexander Potapenko , Andrey Ryabinin , Marco Elver , Michal Hocko , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Thomas Graf , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org, Lorenzo Stoakes , Chris Mason , Alice Ryhl , Andrew Ballance , stable@vger.kernel.org, "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rhashtable: fix vmalloc() deadlock in atomic rehash Message-ID: References: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 04:51:39PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 12:11:24PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > There are users in kernel. For example: > > Thanks for the list. > > > drivers/GPU > > /* Allocate the file in vmalloc memory, it's likely to be big */ > > iter.start = __vmalloc(file_size, GFP_NOWAIT); > > > > AMD-GPU: > > kvzalloc(size, GFP_NOWAIT); > > kvzalloc_objs(struct amdgpu_coredump_ring, GFP_NOWAIT); > > kvzalloc(ring->ring_size, GFP_NOWAIT); > > These appear to be executing out of process context without spin > locks so they're not really GFP_ATOMIC. > > > Virtio ring-testing: > > (alloc_ring(0)), gfpflags_allow_blocking(0) does not allow blocking. > > I didn't really look into this as it's just test code. > > > net/ipv4/udp.c: > > err = bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch(iter, batch_sks, GFP_NOWAIT); > > This looks buggy in exactly the same way as rhashtable. It's > called under spin_lock_bh, and the same lock can be taken on > the softirq path on another CPU. > > So are there any safe users of kvmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC? If not > I suggest that we change kvmalloc to disallow vmalloc when called > with GFP_ATOMIC. > kvmalloc() disallow and vmalloc() allow? The deadlock looks like from below spin_lock(): diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c index e4570bbed854..97aac4a4a92b 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c @@ -1025,7 +1025,13 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *source, } } } else { - spin_lock(&br->hash_lock); + if (in_serving_softirq()) { + if (!spin_trylock(&br->hash_lock)) + return; + } else { + spin_lock(&br->hash_lock); + } + fdb = fdb_create(br, source, addr, vid, flags); if (fdb) { trace_br_fdb_update(br, source, addr, vid, flags); is that applicable for bridge update code? -- Uladzislau Rezki