From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.wp.pl (mx3.wp.pl [212.77.101.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 163C0372B37 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.77.101.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774631039; cv=none; b=XU2D9G86POL02Ws3aOpiGOUorc1a0mIvsjdgcrGPE3dxRrEH/8xfRis18ASO5M0KWZeVFDZS+Y4LThcB4LPLDOEfm9ggTlhFGW9LAkkuZ5dDvfZPLdSYPY3W6zPAXvCvK39v7yeoILK+d/oa3ITYcxBf/wb7zSJ1WsDkdeDkFnc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774631039; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+tauNC4op/1f1UOR6hc+/glfE3S89C+fm7BIK2HXnBQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WpSMknzREl34XvCYCEQ1Sautd2dXYXejGfwN3OVDotwVM1XUlZd3dsVUBVnmf0dXRgwzPp0LKJN4ZGTymsRYcN3wfgx904e39gRWaQGh9va70srCKxHlTYHJMj2oRUVVjZrRWIy4UZVD3H7kglO59222gP2pu535OuMJn47q0Fg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=wp.pl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wp.pl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wp.pl header.i=@wp.pl header.b=CUSlZjbC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.77.101.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=wp.pl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wp.pl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wp.pl header.i=@wp.pl header.b="CUSlZjbC" Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 22480 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2026 18:03:48 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wp.pl; s=20241105; t=1774631028; bh=1pNHOOxkrInwAKVW1kychxWbDV24cN7qwurpLcenHAg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From; b=CUSlZjbCPiBqxQiLpBHw2huIXCvZEblim9cHHLDW+olL1wSW0EUM03fCaDQlC6vhk seIVRHg+yHBBx2eMqOJ6c7+Pch2dzdgrBTC9ocHOIbZKhlSuPDgCnZSZL4NvF+PFi/ fjvpWRR2REI1HKvnOMYMINOEr+SGCX8kfdpV1qk+pdXpgjXu4Fh61Ucaiag14ywOWD Brxok7210QSDFuM/h4YlftujO9V3uT+07kKpAk9bkgp2YlV/C8qMLe/djDe8NJ5r4U wL0UqmcrxEIc5BXmYe/rgGZBWanSraSi+HnYQz4f+sI0rajVL1vLDEWZ19OE6UK1xx XE4xilcro5gzA== Received: from 83.5.169.164.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (HELO [192.168.1.21]) (olek2@wp.pl@[83.5.169.164]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Mar 2026 18:03:48 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 18:03:48 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] crypto: testmgr - Add test vectors for authenc(hmac(md5),cbc(aes)) To: Herbert Xu Cc: davem@davemloft.net, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260303184916.69132-1-olek2@wp.pl> Content-Language: pl From: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WP-MailID: c35bd8ae87df3f160010f467442666b9 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty Wirtualnej Polski X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000009 [YFOn] Hi Herbert, On 14/03/2026 05:47, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 07:48:44PM +0100, Aleksander Jan Bajkowski wrote: >> Test vectors were generated starting from existing CBC(AES) test vectors >> (RFC3602, NIST SP800-38A) and adding HMAC(MD5) computed with Python >> script. Then, the results were double-checked on Mediatek MT7981 (safexcel) >> and NXP P2020 (talitos). Both platforms pass self-tests. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski >> --- >> v4: >> - rename aes-generic -> aes-lib >> v3: >> - correct sha384 -> md5 in description >> v2: >> - rebase and resolve conflicts >> --- >> crypto/testmgr.c | 7 ++ >> crypto/testmgr.h | 255 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 262 insertions(+) > The previous patch has already been applied. Please redo this > as an incremental patch. Checked the crypto tree, and this patch still isn't applied. I've sent multiple test vectors, and you're probably referring to a another patch. Should I send it again, or will you accept it as is? By the way, that's the last one. As of now, all my routers have the missing vectors added :) Regards, Aleksander