Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: arm64/sm4 - Fix possible crash in GCM cryption
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:34:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7dbadbf-dade-fb1e-bda3-d23d567c620f@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8gIC8Yn/E8Kwtf0@gondor.apana.org.au>

Hi Herbert,

On 1/18/23 10:54 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:19:28PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
>> When the cryption total length is zero, GCM cryption call
>> skcipher_walk_done() will cause an unexpected crash, so skip calling
>> this function to avoid possible crash when the GCM cryption length
>> is equal to zero.
>>
>> Fixes: ae1b83c7d572 ("crypto: arm64/sm4 - add CE implementation for GCM mode")
>> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/crypto/sm4-ce-gcm-glue.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/sm4-ce-gcm-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/sm4-ce-gcm-glue.c
>> index c450a2025ca9..9b63bcf9aa85 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/sm4-ce-gcm-glue.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/sm4-ce-gcm-glue.c
>> @@ -178,11 +178,13 @@ static int gcm_crypt(struct aead_request *req, struct skcipher_walk *walk,
>>   
>>   		kernel_neon_end();
>>   
>> -		err = skcipher_walk_done(walk, tail);
>> -		if (err)
>> -			return err;
>> -		if (walk->nbytes)
>> -			kernel_neon_begin();
>> +		if (walk->nbytes) {
> 
> Please do
> 		if (!walk->nbytes)
> 			break;

Thanks for the suggestion, a new patch has been sent.

> 
> As an additional improvement, the tail calculation can be removed
> entirely because you already set the chunksize so the walker should
> only be feeding you multiples of chunksize except at the end.
> 
> Cheers
I printed the walk->nbytes of each iteration of the walker, it is not
always multiples of chunksize except at the end when the algorithm test
manager is turned on.

For example, during a GCM encryption process, I get data like this:

     total = 4014, nbytes = 2078, tail = 14
     total = 1950, nbytes = 16, tail = 0
     total = 1934, nbytes = 311, tail = 7
     total = 1630, nbytes = 16, tail = 0
     total = 1614, nbytes = 16, tail = 0
     total = 1598, nbytes = 1598, tail = 14

Is my understanding wrong?

Best regards,
Tianjia

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 14:19 [PATCH] crypto: arm64/sm4 - Fix possible crash in GCM cryption Tianjia Zhang
2023-01-18 14:54 ` Herbert Xu
2023-01-30  7:34   ` Tianjia Zhang [this message]
2023-01-30  8:15     ` Herbert Xu
2023-01-30  9:01       ` Herbert Xu
2023-01-31  9:39         ` Tianjia Zhang
2023-01-30  7:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Tianjia Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c7dbadbf-dade-fb1e-bda3-d23d567c620f@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox