From: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: irq: Unregister on-stack timer and work from debugobjects
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 19:36:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dae41fe0-60ff-4fa7-a7dc-2a3947aa08bb@davidgow.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806053804.106724-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Le 06/08/2026 à 1:38 PM, Eric Biggers a écrit :
> In kunit_run_irq_test(), call destroy_hrtimer_on_stack() and
> destroy_work_on_stack() to unregister the hrtimer and work from the
> debugobjects infrastructure (when CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y and
> CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK=y) before the function returns.
>
> Found via code review; the lack of the unregistrations didn't actually
> cause a warning, since the objects are inactive upon return anyway. But
> they should be there, otherwise debugobjects keeps tracking the objects.
>
> Fixes: 950a81224e8b ("lib/crypto: tests: Add hash-test-template.h and gen-hash-testvecs.py")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> This patch is targeting libcrypto-next
Nice catch, thanks!
Reviewed-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
Cheers,
-- David
>
> include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h b/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h
> index 3802b6fb218ed..b46fa1696360c 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/run-in-irq-context.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static inline void kunit_run_irq_test(struct kunit *test, bool (*func)(void *),
> /* Cancel the timer and work. */
> hrtimer_cancel(&state.timer);
> flush_work(&state.bh_work);
> + destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&state.timer);
> + destroy_work_on_stack(&state.bh_work);
>
> /* Sanity check: the timer and BH functions should have been run. */
> KUNIT_EXPECT_GT_MSG(test, atomic_read(&state.hardirq_func_calls), 0,
>
> base-commit: 4bceb5614e0fc0338d6787f39df5472bfd72eaab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 5:38 [PATCH] kunit: irq: Unregister on-stack timer and work from debugobjects Eric Biggers
2026-08-06 11:36 ` David Gow [this message]
2026-08-07 22:04 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dae41fe0-60ff-4fa7-a7dc-2a3947aa08bb@davidgow.net \
--to=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox