From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>,
Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, horia.geanta@nxp.com,
pankaj.gupta@nxp.com, gaurav.jain@nxp.com, heinzm@redhat.com,
snitzer@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
qat-linux@intel.com, iuliana.prodan@nxp.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, agk@redhat.com, V.Sethi@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] crypto: api - adjust meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 12:41:19 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daf1c4c8-292f-4954-9bde-b6d891a832dc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230705201812.GB866@sol.localdomain>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 05:40:08PM +0100, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
>
> > Algorithms that do not set this flag will guarantee
>
> "will guarantee" => "guarantee"
>
> > that memory is not allocated during request processing, except in
> > the avoidable exception cases described below.
>
> "avoidable exception cases" => "exception cases"
>
> Whether they are avoidable depends on the user.
>
> > * Users can request an algorithm with this flag unset if they can't handle
> > * memory allocation failures or sleeping during request processing.
>
> Why add the "sleeping during request processing" part? Isn't that controlled on
> a per-request basis by CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP which is a separate thing?
>
> > * They should also follow the constraints below.
>
> "should" => "must"
>
> > + * - The input and output scatterlists must have no more than 4 entries.
> > + * If the scatterlists contain more than 4 entries, the algorithm may
> > + * allocate memory.
>
> "If the scatterlists contains" => "If either scatterlist contains"
>
> Otherwise it is unclear whether this is talking about the length of each
> scatterlist individually, or the sum of their lengths.
>
> - Eric
Hi
I wouldn't change the meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY (because
people will forget about this subtle change anyway).
Also note that dm-integrity allocates arbitrarily large sg-lists when
encrypting the journal, so if you change the meaning of
CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY, there would be no flag left for dm-integrity
to test.
I would introduce a new flag, something like
CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY_FOR_5_OR_MORE_SG_ENTRIES. dm-crypt can then
filter the algorithms based on this flag - and the rest of the kernel code
may stay unchanged.
Mikulas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 16:40 [PATCH 0/3] crypto: adjust meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] dm integrity: do not filter algos with CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 20:12 ` Eric Biggers
2023-07-05 20:57 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 21:57 ` Herbert Xu
2024-02-07 6:22 ` Meenakshi Aggarwal
2025-02-18 8:37 ` Herbert Xu
2025-02-20 10:18 ` Meenakshi Aggarwal
2024-07-04 10:39 ` Horia Geanta
2023-07-07 10:25 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2023-07-05 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] crypto: api - adjust meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 20:18 ` Eric Biggers
2023-07-07 10:41 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2023-07-05 16:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] crypto: qat - remove CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY flag Giovanni Cabiddu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daf1c4c8-292f-4954-9bde-b6d891a832dc@redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=V.Sethi@nxp.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=gaurav.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
--cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
--cc=iuliana.prodan@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@nxp.com \
--cc=qat-linux@intel.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox