public inbox for linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>,
	Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, horia.geanta@nxp.com,
	pankaj.gupta@nxp.com, gaurav.jain@nxp.com, heinzm@redhat.com,
	snitzer@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	qat-linux@intel.com, iuliana.prodan@nxp.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, agk@redhat.com, V.Sethi@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] crypto: api - adjust meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 12:41:19 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <daf1c4c8-292f-4954-9bde-b6d891a832dc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230705201812.GB866@sol.localdomain>



On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, Eric Biggers wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 05:40:08PM +0100, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
> 
> > Algorithms that do not set this flag will guarantee
> 
> "will guarantee" => "guarantee"
>  
> > that memory is not allocated during request processing, except in
> > the avoidable exception cases described below.
> 
> "avoidable exception cases" => "exception cases"
> 
> Whether they are avoidable depends on the user.
> 
> > * Users can request an algorithm with this flag unset if they can't handle
> > * memory allocation failures or sleeping during request processing.
> 
> Why add the "sleeping during request processing" part?  Isn't that controlled on
> a per-request basis by CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP which is a separate thing?
> 
> > * They should also follow the constraints below.
> 
> "should" => "must"
> 
> > + *	- The input and output scatterlists must have no more than 4 entries.
> > + *	  If the scatterlists contain more than 4 entries, the algorithm may
> > + *	  allocate memory.
> 
> "If the scatterlists contains" => "If either scatterlist contains"
> 
> Otherwise it is unclear whether this is talking about the length of each
> scatterlist individually, or the sum of their lengths.
> 
> - Eric

Hi

I wouldn't change the meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY (because 
people will forget about this subtle change anyway).

Also note that dm-integrity allocates arbitrarily large sg-lists when 
encrypting the journal, so if you change the meaning of 
CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY, there would be no flag left for dm-integrity 
to test.

I would introduce a new flag, something like 
CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY_FOR_5_OR_MORE_SG_ENTRIES. dm-crypt can then 
filter the algorithms based on this flag - and the rest of the kernel code 
may stay unchanged.

Mikulas


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-05 16:40 [PATCH 0/3] crypto: adjust meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] dm integrity: do not filter algos with CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 20:12   ` Eric Biggers
2023-07-05 20:57     ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 21:57       ` Herbert Xu
2024-02-07  6:22         ` Meenakshi Aggarwal
2025-02-18  8:37           ` Herbert Xu
2025-02-20 10:18             ` Meenakshi Aggarwal
2024-07-04 10:39         ` Horia Geanta
2023-07-07 10:25     ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2023-07-05 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] crypto: api - adjust meaning of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY Giovanni Cabiddu
2023-07-05 20:18   ` Eric Biggers
2023-07-07 10:41     ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2023-07-05 16:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] crypto: qat - remove CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY flag Giovanni Cabiddu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=daf1c4c8-292f-4954-9bde-b6d891a832dc@redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=V.Sethi@nxp.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=gaurav.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
    --cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
    --cc=iuliana.prodan@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@nxp.com \
    --cc=qat-linux@intel.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox