From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7969E1FF60E for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746449557; cv=none; b=SLYIQGkA9cur1Fh4eQUeDdyd2Gx/3qKSu8d515vyHauA7cJR9FF5v0O5DBrx+tHuOF14xLn6Qk8jSPushdgZVye6/AzmpJzyvOxW3gtdOWZKVyzWadYnEl6YAbIRlQoxClQ4gIJtqCs/QeCDJlN+L9aD0fuiphYsAxeUizB3E9Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746449557; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VVJPCLBXPKuDZgfijk5Z9PD8hVF5UPOlxRvtNV2ywcw=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type; b=OwebZPMAQ/lOM3thi8H/DqgY+7rIICLydw7LmeVDkAKJRPGcN90tKz3tXwvWnlGftSK+O/kqpMF6f5T0E7n3hiedjPKNyQMnMGkDOmF/UvqVUGbzBYv+2soPjyJfUa2ILNHSL15uKd97Ka+Wi+ze22eiWN0DprMq7WbnnxjNDuU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=nx0bC9vE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="nx0bC9vE" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 544LiCxq009912; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:52:33 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=J7dw3XiHYEtL+dQ/wOJ oTH/cBeg8i6RBk5Jf++of3RY=; b=nx0bC9vEXqAIx9Dn5fBy/Z8+jwGeO08vOQN NjxJcYoi07W3zNbj7O2mhfoJsOmfhBcYBKCC7lB0kVkH+QulbGTEbDmqk4NPO1q6 WNccgiTrNxRhOQf0+lPGmQqKPstBog/9DxTayVavGUq9bEwQxtUF/btqRK/3aMgZ q9As8JlyYK1eiykIRx2TMKTyHqgEX0sjMORyOKDyIhzzSVpq2O4KfnQ4WuXoo4yD 1f4KUa1a/lL6oEIfJFOnwJzePjvZjbsS1DcqfBAjP+V71DaCZOcqKFHn8zeyut6P PuB/uYbYDQbpcFgk1FBPbpC/13VfqiBZBA1WoyiNkjB7sehkJKw== Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 46egcv2w4y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 05 May 2025 12:52:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 545C0WF5025798; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:52:32 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.6]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 46dwuypcq7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 05 May 2025 12:52:32 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.231]) by smtprelay04.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 545CqV2r22676130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 May 2025 12:52:31 GMT Received: from smtpav04.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385E758054; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:52:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3C858045; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:52:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.5.196.140]) by smtpav04.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:52:30 +0000 (GMT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 14:52:30 +0200 From: Harald Freudenberger To: Herbert Xu Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Franzki , Holger Dengler Subject: s390: Still CI failures in linux-next kernel Reply-To: freude@linux.ibm.com Mail-Reply-To: freude@linux.ibm.com Message-ID: X-Sender: freude@linux.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 49rdrTvL6OCxZuGdUAlei3C0dFBA3J1P X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwNTA1MDEyMSBTYWx0ZWRfX2jbwZz6Yallv 70RpLn2NyDm9JO5J+AOwYDvxo7d9n8ZXSPE0d+Dc9cQz1xJpbotIDl3BDVKaGH3X+iJXAc3TNaG HFlH3Gdyx+7VjG+mdTMms2kN3xELme4gutWW8yYJ7WNgKGDiPxecNFnWN4eS1gBjEB0D+7JQ6ia 2pfBNLoG4I+UtT5aMiiwr+7mecV4zRBwaamUTI75WwYMbJn9G7ebO9XIzZiujqOXtsgy5X3GyhF tyvFv1Q6dnS3MIMqw0I0KWZnvVyd+pB2QvvQknAAHrep1H8qBZ0jUK2Woo2C3Ie8izX4mqmvqtN X8tpBLaB7HvClax18fXwwk0trOma6NM2+oZUSwcQ8y3HKP07c2MpwTJZJf6DgMCGqm32vxqtPVm uIGqDMoKdMeQ0WxJ4u6c5Tne0BEhwMgp8hw+L4zkSykM9cYIo7K9JJQ6GnxWBbKj0SMykC9o X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=O7k5vA9W c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6818b491 cx=c_pps a=5BHTudwdYE3Te8bg5FgnPg==:117 a=5BHTudwdYE3Te8bg5FgnPg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=dt9VzEwgFbYA:10 a=7c5RAtW7rWw1o0h8nkIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 49rdrTvL6OCxZuGdUAlei3C0dFBA3J1P X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.0.736,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-05-05_05,2025-05-05_01,2025-02-21_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=578 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam authscore=0 authtc=n/a authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2504070000 definitions=main-2505050121 Hello Herbert with the latest fix still the CI complains about the sha384 algorithm. Looks like you forget to adapt the init for sha384, with the following hunk all works fine: diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c index 14818fcc9cd4..fa6a3a0dba57 100644 --- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c @@ -86,15 +86,16 @@ static int sha384_init(struct shash_desc *desc) { struct s390_sha_ctx *ctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc); - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[0] = SHA384_H0; - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[2] = SHA384_H1; - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[4] = SHA384_H2; - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[6] = SHA384_H3; - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[8] = SHA384_H4; - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[10] = SHA384_H5; - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[12] = SHA384_H6; - *(__u64 *)&ctx->state[14] = SHA384_H7; + ctx->sha512.state[0] = SHA384_H0; + ctx->sha512.state[1] = SHA384_H1; + ctx->sha512.state[2] = SHA384_H2; + ctx->sha512.state[3] = SHA384_H3; + ctx->sha512.state[4] = SHA384_H4; + ctx->sha512.state[5] = SHA384_H5; + ctx->sha512.state[6] = SHA384_H6; + ctx->sha512.state[7] = SHA384_H7; ctx->count = 0; + ctx->sha512.count_hi = 0; ctx->func = CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512; return 0; Thanks and have a nice day Harald Freudenberger