Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] crypto: ti - Add support for AES-GCM in DTHEv2 driver

[T Pratham <t-pratham@ti.com>]

On 14/11/25 12:17, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Pratham,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on herbert-crypto-2.6/master]
> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.18-rc5]

Applied to incorrect tree. The patch depends on [1] which has been
merged in cryptodev-2.6/master

> [cannot apply to herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master next-20251113]

This is maybe due to the first patch in the series, which was already
present in the tree?

> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:573:17: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_alloc_sync_aead'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      573 |         ctx->aead_fb = crypto_alloc_sync_aead(alg_name, 0,
>          |                        ^
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:573:17: note: did you mean 'crypto_alloc_aead'?
>    include/crypto/aead.h:181:21: note: 'crypto_alloc_aead' declared here
>      181 | struct crypto_aead *crypto_alloc_aead(const char *alg_name, u32 type, u32 mask);
>          |                     ^
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:573:15: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct crypto_sync_aead *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
>      573 |         ctx->aead_fb = crypto_alloc_sync_aead(alg_name, 0,
>          |                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>      574 |                                               CRYPTO_ALG_NEED_FALLBACK);
>          |                                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:588:2: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_free_sync_aead'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      588 |         crypto_free_sync_aead(ctx->aead_fb);
>          |         ^
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:588:2: note: did you mean 'crypto_free_aead'?
>    include/crypto/aead.h:194:20: note: 'crypto_free_aead' declared here
>      194 | static inline void crypto_free_aead(struct crypto_aead *tfm)
>          |                    ^
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:831:2: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_clear_flags'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      831 |         crypto_sync_aead_clear_flags(ctx->aead_fb, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MASK);
>          |         ^
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:831:2: note: did you mean 'crypto_aead_clear_flags'?
>    include/crypto/aead.h:298:20: note: 'crypto_aead_clear_flags' declared here
>      298 | static inline void crypto_aead_clear_flags(struct crypto_aead *tfm, u32 flags)
>          |                    ^
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:832:2: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_set_flags'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      832 |         crypto_sync_aead_set_flags(ctx->aead_fb,
>          |         ^
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:836:9: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_setkey'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      836 |         return crypto_sync_aead_setkey(ctx->aead_fb, key, keylen);
>          |                ^
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:836:9: note: did you mean 'crypto_aead_setkey'?
>    include/crypto/aead.h:319:5: note: 'crypto_aead_setkey' declared here
>      319 | int crypto_aead_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm,
>          |     ^
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:846:9: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_setauthsize'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      846 |         return crypto_sync_aead_setauthsize(ctx->aead_fb, authsize);
>          |                ^
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:846:9: note: did you mean 'crypto_aead_setauthsize'?
>    include/crypto/aead.h:332:5: note: 'crypto_aead_setauthsize' declared here
>      332 | int crypto_aead_setauthsize(struct crypto_aead *tfm, unsigned int authsize);
>          |     ^
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:854:2: error: call to undeclared function 'SYNC_AEAD_REQUEST_ON_STACK'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      854 |         SYNC_AEAD_REQUEST_ON_STACK(subreq, ctx->aead_fb);
>          |         ^
>>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:854:29: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq'
>      854 |         SYNC_AEAD_REQUEST_ON_STACK(subreq, ctx->aead_fb);
>          |                                    ^~~~~~
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:856:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq'
>      856 |         aead_request_set_callback(subreq, req->base.flags,
>          |                                   ^~~~~~
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:858:25: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq'
>      858 |         aead_request_set_crypt(subreq, req->src, req->dst, req->cryptlen, req->iv);
>          |                                ^~~~~~
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:859:22: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq'
>      859 |         aead_request_set_ad(subreq, req->assoclen);
>          |                             ^~~~~~
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:861:41: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq'
>      861 |         return rctx->enc ? crypto_aead_encrypt(subreq) :
>          |                                                ^~~~~~
>    drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:862:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq'
>      862 |                 crypto_aead_decrypt(subreq);
>          |                                     ^~~~~~
>    14 errors generated.
> 
All the errors are due to the patch [1] not being present in the applied
tree. It should be fine when applied to cryptodev-2.6/master.

[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20251022171902.724369-2-t-pratham@ti.com/
-- 
Regards
T Pratham <t-pratham@ti.com>