From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDDFC282CE for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B85B24B47 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726789AbfFDH4K (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:56:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:50995 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726786AbfFDH4J (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:56:09 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id f204so9749918wme.0 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:56:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oZlRAOsVn9ePxA/Zig+oyFItJmNAsnSY1BiCxTvDEH0=; b=H6vrIEZ2z1ZvXJKbANU8iYBZODLwLRiXitZsstneC0F5DQtvtTRph7GxndgkInVDwx yOoso+Ac/nQoY/77I8nuHKGbPmnwAS4kFHE0OX+C0JTRjoMARCSSysLSWuXyJUQOs/c2 GhPD/S3xc0OAuWPM1Gd87XI3G9+rkApCdI8OcL4ChFUSvUao/ZzHVegu5AchCeZmSqNf XAjT4aLlTWGl3xzY78M4IJA/Y1YIkWLlmP16v6dTYhc50zgsP29kslWTgBMADqmzdnOM xMumYdA3un6f56GBoysKgOgkRHjs8AHwqzzgkzHNt3yjWlr01mODLo9hi+fiEj8e/xn4 9cqA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVUDqcTKf0AhcK1o7rifGUIzsFJOWWudMczcH4niNdlsEeZlvBX 28UeR8aVjsY2jparZhxf1YM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwlFwwfWUbZetvBnJGgtN11T0hFYdLCr29N3HirCNhHxTbpAeJydzJbOz0AjA9ygu9uFDDlIg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7d13:: with SMTP id y19mr16797788wmc.21.1559634967978; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thl530.multi.box (pD9575227.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.87.82.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm30212449wre.76.2019.06.04.00.56.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:56:05 +0200 From: Thomas Huth To: guoren@kernel.org, buildroot@buildroot.org, Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Thomas De Schampheleire , arnout@mind.be, Guo Ren , zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/qemu: Move patches to version directory Message-ID: <20190604095605.7c9e7ef1@thl530.multi.box> In-Reply-To: <1559564887-4088-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> References: <1559564887-4088-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-csky-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Am Mon, 3 Jun 2019 20:28:06 +0800 schrieb guoren@kernel.org: > From: Guo Ren > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni > --- > ...ix-usage-of-mcontext-structure-on-ARM-uCl.patch | 35 ------------- > .../qemu/0002-configure-improve-usbfs-check.patch | 60 > ---------------------- ...ix-usage-of-mcontext-structure-on-ARM-uCl.patch > | 35 +++++++++++++ .../3.1.0/0002-configure-improve-usbfs-check.patch > | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 95 > deletions(-) delete mode 100644 > package/qemu/0001-user-exec-fix-usage-of-mcontext-structure-on-ARM-uCl.patch > delete mode 100644 > package/qemu/0002-configure-improve-usbfs-check.patch create mode > 100644 > package/qemu/3.1.0/0001-user-exec-fix-usage-of-mcontext-structure-on-ARM-uCl.patch > create mode 100644 > package/qemu/3.1.0/0002-configure-improve-usbfs-check.patch At least the usbfs patch seems to be included in QEMU v4.0, so maybe it would be better to bump the version to 4.0 first? Thomas, did you ever send the first patch to upstream QEMU, too? Looks like a valid patch to me, so I think it should be accepted there, too...? Thomas H