From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3279205E36; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742244490; cv=none; b=GfmbfrAHw0681TWJG+Z4jnEYF8NmksWgftIGifA1QmaFVLXW7+xYmmWgMn/sWkenvdbEWIGufz55mtv9vrPwMmPqAfDc3w6qtEmnlsianStjswafU3di8Fb550t8zKmctenkengEWrrH2jTbfKCa8b0zKhaA+/Mn8x5We12e8bM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742244490; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8pdTXWSW1pT+VXM+eBfg/U6FahxzWexs17ihcIHPMJ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NGWtEcnh/YvEtX7dGBXIYdmWgCzIc0FrZVo3uI/O+CPSQxNX69IkpfaWPP6gXjLyaziQyP76w13/pHTPA7X4mWJ49GrbpfMC61vG1qSIjC7EekDAS8j2b9kTN2/d2yhnYTYN3+Plpl1upotX/zMbD9uX/HSSwvRqTMtNFWOX5gg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EhM8veCq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EhM8veCq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A50DC4CEED; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:48:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742244490; bh=8pdTXWSW1pT+VXM+eBfg/U6FahxzWexs17ihcIHPMJ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EhM8veCqfacvRpt+f0Tvr+Tb69xlnreFzyM3CYm4DK4T3+uPl9ru59UEfXTq0ebK0 CFqn/N9smSOGJjxnJp8Q7S4i7UImh1Net50w71WOgCOAVzz2OpwFsYRLV+agzk6Z1C 3LTvtiRUgukYDcBgUBk5iLbCljivyEw6ZCgak1vig2/flA/wQErtA9Pu1GdpMbJYyz RElF6rdsfJrE/Kj0PJIhJnwP2Q/Uv03S9bGrKUxd3bkKaSRkFnXF6f1oMA2fvj+RKm mxOb9rT8SCANLJJFg+gkynqiThXDC7UvCVYwLN6XBKjkV7uOvLG7zGq8p2g2kCvRgV qUsnEfHJIxt6w== Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:48:07 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , John Garry , Will Deacon , James Clark , Mike Leach , Leo Yan , guoren , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Charlie Jenkins , Bibo Mao , Huacai Chen , Catalin Marinas , Jiri Slaby , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Howard Chu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] perf: Support multiple system call tables in the build Message-ID: References: <20250308003209.234114-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:10:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:45:49PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:47:27PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Still building, but noticed this on x86_64: > > > > > > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests : FAILED! > > > > 106: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! > > > > 107: perf trace exit race : Ok > > > > 108: perf trace record and replay : FAILED! > > > > > > > > > > > > The first doesn´t help that much with verbose mode, haven't checked if > > > > before this series it was failing :-\ > > > > > > > > root@x1:~# perf test -vvv 105 > > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests: > > > > --- start --- > > > > test child forked, pid 19411 > > > > Checking if vmlinux exists > > > > Tracing syscall landlock_add_rule > > > > ---- end(-1) ---- > > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests : FAILED! > > > > root@x1:~# This one is now ok: 0.004 ( 0.000 ms): perf/200342 landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd: 11, rule_type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, rule_attr: 0x7ffd649bd0d0, flags: 45) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) root@number:~# perf test enum 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Ok root@number:~# now looking at: root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvvvv 106 106: perf trace BTF general tests: --- start --- test child forked, pid 200467 Checking if vmlinux BTF exists Testing perf trace's string augmentation String augmentation test failed ---- end(-1) ---- 106: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! root@number:~# No clue from the test, reading its source code now to see where it is failing to try and reproduce the problem. - Arnaldo