linux-csky.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, anup@brainfault.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	palmer@rivosinc.com, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com,
	bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, greentime.hu@sifive.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, jszhang@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com,
	wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 02/17] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Move into ticket_spinlock.h
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 05:15:51 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQFvt2nW4IwpdDo3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230910082911.3378782-3-guoren@kernel.org>

On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:28:56AM -0400, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Move ticket-lock definition into an independent file. This is the
> preparation for the next combo spinlock of riscv.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/spinlock.h        |  87 +---------------------
>  include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
> index 4773334ee638..970590baf61b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
> @@ -1,94 +1,9 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>  
> -/*
> - * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
> - *
> - * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
> - * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
> - * to a test-and-set lock.
> - *
> - * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
> - * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
> - * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
> - * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
> - * a test-and-set.
> - *
> - * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
> - * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with
> - * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc
> - * atomic_cond_read_acquire().
> - *
> - * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
> - * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
> - * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
> - *
> - */
> -
>  #ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H
>  #define __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H
>  
> -#include <linux/atomic.h>
> -#include <asm-generic/spinlock_types.h>
> -
> -static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> -{
> -	u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val);
> -	u16 ticket = val >> 16;
> -
> -	if (ticket == (u16)val)
> -		return;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a
> -	 * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence.  We only
> -	 * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from
> -	 * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we
> -	 * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra
> -	 * orderings are free.
> -	 */
> -	atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL);
> -	smp_mb();
> -}
> -
> -static __always_inline bool arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> -{
> -	u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> -
> -	if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
> -		return false;
> -
> -	return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
> -}
> -
> -static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> -{
> -	u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
> -	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> -
> -	smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
> -}
> -
> -static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> -{
> -	u32 val = lock.val.counter;
> -
> -	return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff));
> -}
> -
> -static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> -{
> -	arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock);
> -
> -	return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(val);
> -}
> -
> -static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> -{
> -	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> -
> -	return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
> -}
> -
> +#include <asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h>
>  #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
>  
>  #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cfcff22b37b3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +/*
> + * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
> + *
> + * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
> + * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
> + * to a test-and-set lock.
> + *
> + * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
> + * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
> + * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
> + * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
> + * a test-and-set.
> + *
> + * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
> + * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with
> + * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc
> + * atomic_cond_read_acquire().
> + *
> + * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
> + * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
> + * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H
> +
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock_types.h>
> +
> +static __always_inline void ticket_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val);
> +	u16 ticket = val >> 16;
> +
> +	if (ticket == (u16)val)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a
> +	 * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence.  We only
> +	 * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from
> +	 * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we
> +	 * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra
> +	 * orderings are free.
> +	 */
> +	atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL);
> +	smp_mb();
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool ticket_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> +
> +	if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void ticket_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> +
> +	smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = lock.val.counter;
> +
> +	return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff));
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock);
> +
> +	return !ticket_spin_value_unlocked(val);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> +
> +	return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding
> + * ticket spinlock functions.
> + */
> +#define arch_spin_is_locked(l)		ticket_spin_is_locked(l)
> +#define arch_spin_is_contended(l)	ticket_spin_is_contended(l)
> +#define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l)	ticket_spin_value_unlocked(l)
> +#define arch_spin_lock(l)		ticket_spin_lock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_trylock(l)		ticket_spin_trylock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_unlock(l)		ticket_spin_unlock(l)
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H */

IIUC here most of the file was moved, and the above defines are introduced.

I understand this pattern of creating the defines at the end of the file is 
the same used in "asm-generic/qspinlock.h" but I don't actually think this
is a good way of doing this.

Instead of having those defines here (and similarly on 
"asm-generic/qspinlock.h", I think it would be better to have those defines 
in the arch-specific header including them, which would allow the arch to 
include multiple spinlock versions and decide (compile-time, even run-time)
which version to use. It gives decision power to the arch code.

(And it would remove the need of undefining them on a later patch)

There are only 3 archs which use this arch-generic qspinlock, so should 
not be a huge deal to have the defines copied there:

# git grep asm-generic/qspinlock.h
arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h:16:#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
arch/sparc/include/asm/qspinlock.h:6:#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:107:#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>

Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-13  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-10  8:28 [PATCH V11 00/17] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support guoren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 01/17] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Reuse arch_spinlock_t of qspinlock guoren
2023-09-11 19:05   ` Leonardo Brás
2023-09-13  1:55     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13  7:59       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 02/17] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Move into ticket_spinlock.h guoren
2023-09-13  8:15   ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 03/17] riscv: Use Zicbop in arch_xchg when available guoren
2023-09-13  8:49   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15 12:36     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-16  1:25       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 14:34         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:13           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-19  7:53             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19 14:38               ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 13:47   ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15  8:22     ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15 11:07       ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 11:26         ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 12:22           ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 12:42             ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-16  0:05               ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 20:32         ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 14:25   ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-14 14:47     ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 11:37       ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 12:14         ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 12:53           ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-31  8:29   ` guoren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 04/17] locking/qspinlock: Improve xchg_tail for number of cpus >= 16k guoren
2023-09-11  2:35   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-11  3:09     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 13:03       ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:10         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13  8:55           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-13 12:52             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 13:06               ` Waiman Long
2023-09-14  3:45                 ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 05/17] riscv: qspinlock: Add basic queued_spinlock support guoren
2023-09-13 20:28   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14  4:46     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  9:43       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15  2:10         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-15  9:08           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:02             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:20               ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 06/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock guoren
2023-09-10 11:06   ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 20:37     ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-13 20:49       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14  4:49         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  7:17           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 07/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce qspinlock param for command line guoren
2023-09-11 15:22   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:06     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 15:34   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:08     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  7:32       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 17:23         ` Waiman Long
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 08/17] riscv: qspinlock: Add virt_spin_lock() support for KVM guest guoren
2023-09-14  8:02   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:12     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:30       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-19  8:04         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19 14:40           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 09/17] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup guoren
2023-09-14  8:32   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:15     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:34       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 10/17] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Enable qspinlock for T-HEAD processors guoren
2023-09-14  9:36   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 11/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-09-15  5:42   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 14:58     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:43       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 12/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add nopvspin kernel parameter guoren
2023-09-15  6:05   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:03     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:44       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 13/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add SBI implementation guoren
2023-09-15  6:23   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:06     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:45       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 14/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add kconfig entry guoren
2023-09-15  6:25   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 15/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add trace point for pv_kick/wait guoren
2023-09-15  6:33   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 16/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-09-15  6:46   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 17/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Implement kvm_sbi_ext_pvlock_kick_cpu() guoren
2023-09-15  6:52   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:58 ` [PATCH V11 00/17] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support Conor Dooley
2023-09-10  9:16   ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  9:20     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  9:31     ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-10  9:49       ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10 19:45         ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-11  3:36           ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 12:52             ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-12  1:33               ` Guo Ren
2023-09-12  8:07                 ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-12 10:58                   ` Guo Ren
2023-11-06 20:42 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-11-12  4:23   ` Guo Ren
2023-11-13 10:19     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQFvt2nW4IwpdDo3@redhat.com \
    --to=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wefu@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).