From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-187.mta1.migadu.com (out-187.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C703282FA for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 22:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748815458; cv=none; b=IbB2I9g9k3WEZcBp3KbMenW8NvyAVYggfdjtDip2fq6/OqqoyYxBGw9UdE7luH77BpJtDb4/17/xTENdDBa2Y0kfXVBI+Sq+7J46Lv+ilZLbvJNl74Y2XXrh+VUctnUN4xFj7FZefTIUqL1UOlmS0/77OhFl2xIF7DYkObpdo4g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748815458; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LKxxUhJ7Ju/VyGFoIOvXUwA7scZKoHcsNwCaeW31VOw=; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Message-Id:Date:To; b=VCdPAaT5aOwgEqCnO+zcyUZ5dEybOU7VbLTs/ziq1M6PfiMhkWgMi8EDD+Ts1r1R9uZu1ZSxUWO8dPf0Qn2OjXA67rxdLqqGttIq/56+c3wcp6+ixWirm8HuKFreIRUFmFaJUGol7o8qjxQ/bAKT4wVLzeyqbmnesiB9jmwEvzE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=RPOi6aC8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="RPOi6aC8" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1748815449; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LKxxUhJ7Ju/VyGFoIOvXUwA7scZKoHcsNwCaeW31VOw=; b=RPOi6aC8gPwk8a3gf1P7W2B8r1snjo+IvP4iplqBwLg3c8McyFSjTnJ4DeFCDuS2/WhJkk //VqfqrTTJzUw1qEx6VSaqBLmZ2t0w7piR6ruL5+L7b80JHBxTXM8zLhtVQjlzgkdWqFhW KwcncaorLtBMWBKcroFOp8f44zpMr3I= From: Itaru Kitayama Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.600.51.1.1\)) Subject: Kernel test setup Message-Id: <0A157714-A431-4AAB-A4E6-DB0C32DB73E9@linux.dev> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:03:51 +0900 To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hi Alison, all, Your comments cleared up my incorrect assumption (in order for meson = test =E2=80=94suite cxl to success, CXL device emulation is required): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/aC_rWIc9TY5F2wGf@aschofie-mobl2.lan/ Now I wonder, thanks to Jonathan=E2=80=99s QEMU series being proposed to = upstream, if it is possible to test the CXL =E2=80=9Cnext" kernel in a = fully CXL devices emulated environment be it on arm/virt or q35 machine. = What do you think? Itaru.=