From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ACE226FDAC for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777476954; cv=none; b=SCZq4vPHhNnylCSYL0qyFtkQafbJ1cuKL0sauUC2sTEg6l7/2n+7yAQ9hJY3aALKSYCf8uv2t5VSsDzGjQ4j6c+RZeQUAVYZYYFvBlR14Kph25DIPzZSdrqWbe0iBHKv2bSmmxv8+qrxNzb2XGDFaBMZYKSWKFfyN1ViO0KhVQA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777476954; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/VZfYzaPjK9D2bnHdCcNfzkYt5+wjHgqvlUkEG1paqw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=amYuBV/55Sq91CgH/Y+keZCbbLITS5+BTK+AinEeVzs6h84aueM/QOyBbN/U5FY5tv51plKVX9DYTU/RpxF/uKM7Zgn6frNMWSfUeh1lIfzQbTSbcvteuFhoGwcTuR0Bp8VB5qPaeUXxZantqzs10I5iCkFwDCxaCiI39xDaBPo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VwQUscgM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VwQUscgM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777476953; x=1809012953; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/VZfYzaPjK9D2bnHdCcNfzkYt5+wjHgqvlUkEG1paqw=; b=VwQUscgMsWoJ/bSpBmp6wCUmt0wPJz2yTs6SIMIcxLWnvwD8MrAVDzMK AiIQfabNNUbuewDxFIfLWWx6KSX9EjOtHU/8gPGt3zQ9BdUIO9BG4VVnc 0eK+7BAJC06KKXrkOLYCfbigKT4Xk2KMyH4MLNGK18CaQFpAwDVzef+zp sN+4Cs2flswjIau78TkYzoazwq7kt670wySUpvM4CXCmEs/IGeBZ/43ze /QquTFkQitczI2vB6aXlcawaGPrkOCuatQRnA4G7NrhU2ro2/zKCoQx2o F7N0c5omT6+rl0VQdkPDQQEHjFFPyPL71uTOFz+t9BAa3Tpp/W8pPDNOF A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CrMWGh+NRFeRkRkHesCaLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gU1qlgU5T+SKl6YlFD3zjw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11771"; a="101070520" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,206,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="101070520" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 08:35:52 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5vsMYOSBRp+zTvRd8DZeuA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5+yGeI/nTG6lA9WQWashXg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,206,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="239329854" Received: from jmaxwel1-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.125.109.38]) ([10.125.109.38]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 08:35:52 -0700 Message-ID: <0c6fe274-c5ef-4b95-9676-bf32f810a45c@intel.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:35:50 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/mbox: Use guard() for mbox_mutex locking To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: jic23@kernel.org, alison.schofield@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, djbw@kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org References: <20260428212220.711160-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20260428224700.koa6ls7thc5ggw27@offworld> Content-Language: en-US From: Dave Jiang In-Reply-To: <20260428224700.koa6ls7thc5ggw27@offworld> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/28/26 3:47 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Dave Jiang wrote: > >> >> On 4/28/26 2:22 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >>> Use the new helpers and simplify the code. No change in >>> semantics. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso >> >> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang >> >> Is this in prep of media ops? > > I found the open coded locking by doing the media ops > patch, but ultimately these changes are independent. May not be worth the churn if it's not part of ongoing work. > > Thanks, > Davidlohr