From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: add a sysfs knob to control memmap_on_memory behavior
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 21:25:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1892d70bda0967284c1e94370a03c7c67e00533d.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734wd1j4z.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 11:13 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> writes:
>
[..]
> >
> > +
> > +static ssize_t memmap_on_memory_store(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + const char *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> > + struct dax_region *dax_region = dev_dax->region;
> > + ssize_t rc;
> > + bool val;
> > +
> > + rc = kstrtobool(buf, &val);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + if (dev_dax->memmap_on_memory == val)
> > + return len;
> > +
> > + device_lock(dax_region->dev);
> > + if (!dax_region->dev->driver) {
>
> This still doesn't look right. Can we check whether the current driver
> is kmem? And only allow change if it's not kmem?
Ah yes I lost track of this todo between revisions when I split this
out. Let me fix that for the next revision.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 4:36 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add DAX ABI for memmap_on_memory Vishal Verma
2023-12-07 4:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentatiion/ABI: Add ABI documentation for sys-bus-dax Vishal Verma
2023-12-07 4:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dax: add a sysfs knob to control memmap_on_memory behavior Vishal Verma
2023-12-07 8:29 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2023-12-07 19:25 ` Verma, Vishal L
2023-12-08 9:20 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2023-12-08 21:24 ` Verma, Vishal L
2023-12-08 3:13 ` Huang, Ying
2023-12-08 21:25 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2023-12-08 11:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-08 21:26 ` Verma, Vishal L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1892d70bda0967284c1e94370a03c7c67e00533d.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox