Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] cxl/pci: Make more use of cxl_register_map
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 21:03:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211010040349.GI3114988@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163381262522.716926.15040239940531720280.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 01:51:13PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> 
> The structure exists to pass around information about register mapping.
> Use it for passing @barno and @block_offset, and eliminate duplicate
> local variables.
> 
> The helpers that use @map do not care about @cxlm, so just pass them a
> pdev instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>

> [djbw: separate @base conversion]
> [djbw: reorder before cxl_pci_setup_regs() refactor to improver readability]
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Fix a 0day report about printing a resource_size_t
> 
>  drivers/cxl/pci.c |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 21dd10a77eb3..f1de236ccd13 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -306,12 +306,13 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
> -					  u8 bar, u64 offset)
> +static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +					  struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *addr;
> -	struct device *dev = cxlm->dev;
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	int bar = map->barno;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	resource_size_t offset = map->block_offset;
>  
>  	/* Basic sanity check that BAR is big enough */
>  	if (pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) < offset) {
> @@ -326,15 +327,15 @@ static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
>  		return addr;
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_dbg(dev, "Mapped CXL Memory Device resource bar %u @ %#llx\n",
> -		bar, offset);
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "Mapped CXL Memory Device resource bar %u @ %pa\n",
> +		bar, &offset);
>  
>  	return addr;
>  }
>  
> -static void cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base)
> +static void cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *base)
>  {
> -	pci_iounmap(to_pci_dev(cxlm->dev), base);
> +	pci_iounmap(pdev, base);
>  }
>  
>  static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec)
> @@ -360,12 +361,12 @@ static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base,
> +static int cxl_probe_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *base,
>  			  struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_component_reg_map *comp_map;
>  	struct cxl_device_reg_map *dev_map;
> -	struct device *dev = cxlm->dev;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  
>  	switch (map->reg_type) {
>  	case CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT:
> @@ -420,12 +421,13 @@ static int cxl_map_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void cxl_decode_register_block(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi,
> -				      u8 *bar, u64 *offset, u8 *reg_type)
> +static void cxl_decode_regblock(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi,
> +				struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  {
> -	*offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK);
> -	*bar = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo);
> -	*reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo);
> +	map->block_offset =
> +		((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK);
> +	map->barno = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo);
> +	map->reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -462,34 +464,23 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
>  
>  	for (i = 0, n_maps = 0; i < regblocks; i++, regloc += 8) {
>  		u32 reg_lo, reg_hi;
> -		u8 reg_type;
> -		u64 offset;
> -		u8 bar;
>  
>  		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc, &reg_lo);
>  		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + 4, &reg_hi);
>  
> -		cxl_decode_register_block(reg_lo, reg_hi, &bar, &offset,
> -					  &reg_type);
> +		map = &maps[n_maps];
> +		cxl_decode_regblock(reg_lo, reg_hi, map);
>  
>  		/* Ignore unknown register block types */
> -		if (reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV)
> +		if (map->reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(cxlm, bar, offset);
> +		base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(pdev, map);
>  		if (!base)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -		map = &maps[n_maps];
> -		map->barno = bar;
> -		map->block_offset = offset;
> -		map->reg_type = reg_type;
> -
> -		ret = cxl_probe_regs(cxlm, base + offset, map);
> -
> -		/* Always unmap the regblock regardless of probe success */
> -		cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(cxlm, base);
> -
> +		ret = cxl_probe_regs(pdev, base + map->block_offset, map);
> +		cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(pdev, base);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-10  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09 16:43 [PATCH v3 00/10] cxl_pci refactor for reusability Dan Williams
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] cxl/pci: Convert register block identifiers to an enum Dan Williams
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] cxl/pci: Remove dev_dbg for unknown register blocks Dan Williams
2021-10-09 16:48   ` Joe Perches
2021-10-09 18:04     ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] cxl/pci: Fix NULL vs ERR_PTR confusion Dan Williams
2021-10-10  3:44   ` Ira Weiny
2021-10-15 16:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-15 20:16     ` Dan Williams
2021-10-15 21:29   ` [PATCH v6 " Dan Williams
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] cxl/pci: Remove pci request/release regions Dan Williams
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] cxl/pci: Make more use of cxl_register_map Dan Williams
2021-10-09 19:04   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-09 20:51   ` [PATCH v4 " Dan Williams
2021-10-10  4:03     ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2021-10-13 23:53     ` [PATCH v5 " Dan Williams
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] cxl/pci: Add @base to cxl_register_map Dan Williams
2021-10-10  4:20   ` Ira Weiny
2021-10-13 22:53     ` Dan Williams
2021-10-15 16:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-15 16:56         ` Dan Williams
2021-10-13 23:57   ` [PATCH v5 " Dan Williams
2021-10-15 21:57     ` [PATCH v6 " Dan Williams
2021-10-18  9:30       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-15 16:27   ` [PATCH v3 " Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-15 16:55     ` Dan Williams
2021-10-18  9:30       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] cxl/pci: Split cxl_pci_setup_regs() Dan Williams
2021-10-10  4:44   ` Ira Weiny
2021-10-13 22:45   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-13 22:49     ` Dan Williams
2021-10-14  0:12       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-10-14  0:48         ` Dan Williams
2021-10-15 16:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-15 17:00     ` Dan Williams
2021-10-15 23:30   ` [PATCH v6 " Dan Williams
2021-11-10 17:14     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-10 17:30       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-11-10 17:43         ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] PCI: Add pci_find_dvsec_capability to find designated VSEC Dan Williams
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] cxl/pci: Use pci core's DVSEC functionality Dan Williams
2021-10-11 13:35   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ocxl: " Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211010040349.GI3114988@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox