Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cxl: add RAS status unmasking for CXL
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:34:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221216123452.0000605e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167112768345.3343090.11728168471813709343.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com>

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:08:03 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:

> By default the CXL RAS mask registers bits are defaulted to 1's and
> suppress all error reporting. If the kernel has negotiated ownership
> of error handling for CXL then unmask the mask registers by writing 0s.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Based on patch posted by Ira [1] to export CXL native error reporting control.
When you say based upon this, you mean cherry-picking just that patch off the
front of Ira's series?  

That raises the question - are we treating this as a fix? If not, probably better
to pull that change into this series that I think is simpler to land than Ira's one
and get that queued up then rebase Ira's.  If we aren't in a hurry, fine to queue
this one second but then you need to rebase on Ira's full series.

The two series are causing a bunch of fuzz for each other. Sure easy to repair
but it's going to require manual intervention.

Jonathan

> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20221212070627.1372402-2-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> 
> v4:
> - Fix masking of RAS register. (Jonathan)
> 
> v3:
> - Remove flex bus port status check. (Jonathan)
> - Only unmask known mask bits. (Jonathan)
> 
> v2:
> - Add definition of PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT. (Dan)
> - Return error for cxl_pci_ras_unmask(). (Dan)
> - Add dev_dbg() for register bits to be cleared. (Dan)
> - Check Flex Port DVSEC status. (Dan)
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h             |    1 +
>  drivers/cxl/pci.c             |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 1b1cf459ac77..31e795c6d537 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static inline int ways_to_eiw(unsigned int ways, u8 *eiw)
>  #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
>  #define CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET 0x4
>  #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
> +#define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_F256B_MASK BIT(8)
>  #define CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_SEVERITY_OFFSET 0x8
>  #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_SEVERITY_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
>  #define CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET 0xC
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 33083a522fd1..64272db6a3fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -419,6 +419,53 @@ static void disable_aer(void *pdev)
>  	pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * CXL v3.0 6.2.3 Table 6-4
> + * The table indicates that if PCIe Flit Mode is set, then CXL is in 256B flits
> + * mode, otherwise it's 68B flits mode.
> + */
> +static bool cxl_pci_flit_256(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u32 lnksta2;
> +
> +	pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2, &lnksta2);
> +	return lnksta2 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT;
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_pci_ras_unmask(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
> +	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	void __iomem *addr;
> +	u32 val, mask;
> +
> +	if (!cxlds->regs.ras)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/* BIOS has CXL error control */
> +	if (!host_bridge->native_cxl_error)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	addr = cxlds->regs.ras + CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET;
> +	val = readl(addr);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Uncorrectable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
> +
> +	mask = CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK;
> +	if (!cxl_pci_flit_256(pdev))
> +		mask &= ~CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_F256B_MASK;
> +	val &= ~mask;
> +	writel(val, addr);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Unmasked Uncorrectable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
> +
> +	addr = cxlds->regs.ras + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET;
> +	val = readl(addr);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Correctable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
> +	val &= ~CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK;
> +	writel(val, addr);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Unmasked Correctable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_register_map map;
> @@ -498,6 +545,7 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  
>  	if (cxlds->regs.ras) {
>  		pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
> +		cxl_pci_ras_unmask(pdev);
>  		rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, disable_aer, pdev);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> index 82a03ea954af..576ee2ec973f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@
>  #define  PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TX_MARGIN	0x0380 /* Transmit Margin */
>  #define  PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_HASD		0x0020 /* HW Autonomous Speed Disable */
>  #define PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2		0x32	/* Link Status 2 */
> +#define  PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT		BIT(10) /* Flit Mode Status */
>  #define PCI_CAP_EXP_ENDPOINT_SIZEOF_V2	0x32	/* end of v2 EPs w/ link */
>  #define PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2		0x34	/* Slot Capabilities 2 */
>  #define  PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2_IBPD	0x00000001 /* In-band PD Disable Supported */
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-16 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-15 18:08 [PATCH v4] cxl: add RAS status unmasking for CXL Dave Jiang
2022-12-16  0:01 ` Dan Williams
2022-12-16  9:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-16 15:37   ` Dave Jiang
2022-12-16 12:34 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-12-16 15:36   ` Dave Jiang
2022-12-16 16:28   ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221216123452.0000605e@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox