Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cxl: add RAS status unmasking for CXL
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:52:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221217175204.0000170a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167120700197.3444116.12992018879314163331.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com>

On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:10:02 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:

> By default the CXL RAS mask registers bits are defaulted to 1's and
> suppress all error reporting. If the kernel has negotiated ownership
> of error handling for CXL then unmask the mask registers by writing 0s.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.
+CC Bjorn for a question on the AER control element of this.

I realized that adding this patch still only enables error because
I didn't check the PCIe spec when writing the QEMU emulation. I had changed
the value of  "Correctable Internal Error Mask" to default to unmasked.
PCIe 6.0 says it defaults to masked.  For some reason I thought these
masks were impdef (should have checked ;)

I'll drop that change in QEMU, but upshot is that if we want the correctable
ones to be delivered, we'll need to clear that bit as well as the ones you
do in this patch.

This got me thinking about why I never saw the same issue for UNC
errors.  Upshot, QEMU never sets the UNCOR mask so defaults to everything on
(it also doesn't allow anyone to write the register). Curiously it has
the code that uses the mask even though there was no means to set any
bits in it. 
I'll fix that (draft patch below) + we should update lspci to cover more of these AER
flags as it's a PITA debugging by reading the hex dumps!

Bjorn, is there any convention on drivers enabling these 'default' masked
AER errors?  Or is expectation that this is policy and userspace should
be dealing with it?

Dave, if you want to test on QEMU in meantime revert:
hw/mem/cxl_type3: Set mask to signal Correct Internal Errors.

and make this change to qemu:

From b0f37bafcc734fe15022c47a2da7f8326b1593c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:43:38 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] hw/pci/aer: Implement PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK register

This register in AER should be both writeable and should
have a default value with a couple of the errors masked
including the Uncorrectable Internal Error used by CXL for
it's error reporting.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 hw/pci/pcie_aer.c          | 4 ++++
 include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c b/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c
index 00ef4b5601..935fbc57b5 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c
@@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ int pcie_aer_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t cap_ver, uint16_t offset,

     pci_set_long(dev->w1cmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS,
                  PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED);
+    pci_set_long(dev->config + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
+                 PCI_ERR_UNC_MASK_DEFAULT);
+    pci_set_long(dev->wmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
+                 PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED);

     pci_set_long(dev->config + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER,
                  PCI_ERR_UNC_SEVERITY_DEFAULT);
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
index 963dc2e170..6ec4785448 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
@@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ typedef enum PCIExpLinkWidth {
                                          PCI_ERR_UNC_ATOP_EBLOCKED |    \
                                          PCI_ERR_UNC_TLP_PRF_BLOCKED)

+#define PCI_ERR_UNC_MASK_DEFAULT        (PCI_ERR_UNC_INTN | \
+                                         PCI_ERR_UNC_TLP_PRF_BLOCKED)
+
 #define PCI_ERR_UNC_SEVERITY_DEFAULT    (PCI_ERR_UNC_DLP |              \
                                          PCI_ERR_UNC_SDN |              \
                                          PCI_ERR_UNC_FCP |              \
--
2.37.2

I'm testing the kernel side with:

From a5da67af2d2b4e792de2d88c74a68da3a17d2872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:46:45 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] HACK: Enable the AER internal errors

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/cxl/pci.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
index bfdf92a9aef6..ef7a6ab41eb7 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
@@ -778,7 +778,18 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
                return rc;

        if (cxlds->regs.ras) {
+               u32 mask;
+               printk("trying to unmask\n");
                pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
+               pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, &mask);
+               mask &= ~PCI_ERR_COR_INTERNAL;
+               printk("unamsking cor\n");
+               pci_write_config_word(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, mask);
+
+               pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, &mask);
+               mask &= ~PCI_ERR_UNC_INTN;
+               printk("unmasking uncor\n");
+               pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, mask);
                cxl_pci_ras_unmask(pdev);
                rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, disable_aer, pdev);
                if (rc)
--
2.37.2



> 
> ---
> 
> Based on patch posted by Ira [1] to export CXL native error reporting control.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20221212070627.1372402-2-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> 
> v5:
> - Add single debug out to show mask changing. (Dan)
> 
> v4:
> - Fix masking of RAS register. (Jonathan)
> 
> v3:
> - Remove flex bus port status check. (Jonathan)
> - Only unmask known mask bits. (Jonathan)
> 
> v2:
> - Add definition of PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT. (Dan)
> - Return error for cxl_pci_ras_unmask(). (Dan)
> - Add dev_dbg() for register bits to be cleared. (Dan)
> - Check Flex Port DVSEC status. (Dan)
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h             |    1 +
>  drivers/cxl/pci.c             |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 1b1cf459ac77..31e795c6d537 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static inline int ways_to_eiw(unsigned int ways, u8 *eiw)
>  #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
>  #define CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET 0x4
>  #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
> +#define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_F256B_MASK BIT(8)
>  #define CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_SEVERITY_OFFSET 0x8
>  #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_SEVERITY_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
>  #define CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET 0xC
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 33083a522fd1..1e5fc69bcc4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -419,6 +419,54 @@ static void disable_aer(void *pdev)
>  	pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * CXL v3.0 6.2.3 Table 6-4
> + * The table indicates that if PCIe Flit Mode is set, then CXL is in 256B flits
> + * mode, otherwise it's 68B flits mode.
> + */
> +static bool cxl_pci_flit_256(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u32 lnksta2;
> +
> +	pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2, &lnksta2);
> +	return lnksta2 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT;
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_pci_ras_unmask(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
> +	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	void __iomem *addr;
> +	u32 orig_val, val, mask;
> +
> +	if (!cxlds->regs.ras)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/* BIOS has CXL error control */
> +	if (!host_bridge->native_cxl_error)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	addr = cxlds->regs.ras + CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET;
> +	orig_val = readl(addr);
> +
> +	mask = CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK;
> +	if (!cxl_pci_flit_256(pdev))
> +		mask &= ~CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_F256B_MASK;
> +	val = orig_val & ~mask;
> +	writel(val, addr);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Uncorrectable RAS Errors Mask: %#x -> %#x\n",
> +		orig_val, val);
> +
> +	addr = cxlds->regs.ras + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET;
> +	orig_val = readl(addr);
> +	val = orig_val & ~CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK;
> +	writel(val, addr);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Correctable RAS Errors Mask: %#x -> %#x\n",
> +		orig_val, val);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_register_map map;
> @@ -498,6 +546,7 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  
>  	if (cxlds->regs.ras) {
>  		pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
> +		cxl_pci_ras_unmask(pdev);
>  		rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, disable_aer, pdev);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> index 82a03ea954af..576ee2ec973f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@
>  #define  PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TX_MARGIN	0x0380 /* Transmit Margin */
>  #define  PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_HASD		0x0020 /* HW Autonomous Speed Disable */
>  #define PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2		0x32	/* Link Status 2 */
> +#define  PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT		BIT(10) /* Flit Mode Status */
>  #define PCI_CAP_EXP_ENDPOINT_SIZEOF_V2	0x32	/* end of v2 EPs w/ link */
>  #define PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2		0x34	/* Slot Capabilities 2 */
>  #define  PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2_IBPD	0x00000001 /* In-band PD Disable Supported */
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-17 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-16 16:10 [PATCH v5] cxl: add RAS status unmasking for CXL Dave Jiang
2022-12-17 17:52 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-12-17 18:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-05 16:53     ` Dave Jiang
2023-01-06 11:22       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-29 17:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-05 16:31     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-05 16:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-06 11:26         ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10  8:07           ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-10 12:29             ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221217175204.0000170a@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox