From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: <alison.schofield@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <fan.ni@samsung.com>,
<a.manzanares@samsung.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hw/cxl: Add get scan media capabilities mailbox command support
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 12:01:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230515120157.00003d89@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230426021418.10186-2-dave@stgolabs.net>
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 19:14:16 -0700
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> Use simple heuristics to determine the cost of scanning any given chunk,
> assuming cost is even across the whole device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Hi.
A few trivial additions / comments / moans.
Obviously it's an RFC but I can't resist pointing things out you'd
fix for the v1.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> index 0849cfbc2a4c..f346aa8ce3b2 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ enum {
> #define GET_POISON_LIST 0x0
> #define INJECT_POISON 0x1
> #define CLEAR_POISON 0x2
> + #define GET_SCAN_MEDIA_CAPABILITIES 0x3
> PHYSICAL_SWITCH = 0x51
> #define IDENTIFY_SWITCH_DEVICE 0x0
> };
> @@ -882,7 +883,7 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_media_clear_poison(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> }
> }
> -
> +
Hmm. Where did that white space sneak in?
I'm guessing in something else I'm carrying on the branch you based on (I'm not
seeing this locally now - so might already be fixed).
Still shouldn't be in here!
> QLIST_FOREACH(ent, poison_list, node) {
> /*
> * Test for contained in entry. Simpler than general case
> @@ -934,6 +935,45 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_media_clear_poison(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> +static CXLRetCode
> +cmd_media_get_scan_media_capabilities(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> + CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len)
> +{
> + struct get_scan_media_capabilities_pl {
> + uint64_t pa;
> + uint64_t length;
> + } QEMU_PACKED;
I'd add some blank lines to help readability a little. One here.
> + struct get_scan_media_capabilities_out_pl {
> + uint32_t estimated_runtime_ms;
> + } QEMU_PACKED;
One here.
> + struct get_scan_media_capabilities_pl *in = (void *)cmd->payload;
> + struct get_scan_media_capabilities_out_pl *out = (void *)cmd->payload;
> + uint64_t query_start;
> + uint64_t query_length;
> +
> + query_start = ldq_le_p(&in->pa);
> + /* 64 byte alignment required */
> + if (query_start & 0x3f) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
> + }
> + query_length = ldq_le_p(&in->length) * 64;
> +
> + if (query_start + query_length > cxl_dstate->mem_size) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PA;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Just use 400 nanosecond access/read latency + 100 ns for
> + * the cost of updating the poison list. For small enough
> + * chunks return at least 1 ms.
> + */
> + stq_le_p(&out->estimated_runtime_ms,
> + MAX(1, query_length * (0.0005L/64)));
> +
> + *len = sizeof(*out);
> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> #define IMMEDIATE_CONFIG_CHANGE (1 << 1)
> #define IMMEDIATE_DATA_CHANGE (1 << 2)
> #define IMMEDIATE_POLICY_CHANGE (1 << 3)
> @@ -972,6 +1012,9 @@ static struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set[256][256] = {
> cmd_media_inject_poison, 8, 0 },
> [MEDIA_AND_POISON][CLEAR_POISON] = { "MEDIA_AND_POISON_CLEAR_POISON",
> cmd_media_clear_poison, 72, 0 },
> + [MEDIA_AND_POISON][GET_SCAN_MEDIA_CAPABILITIES] = { "MEDIA_AND_POISON_GET_SCAN_MEDIA_CAPABILITIES",
> + cmd_media_get_scan_media_capabilities, 16, 0 },
> +
Grumpy maintainer moment. No blank line should be added here ;)
> };
>
> static struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set_sw[256][256] = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-26 2:14 [PATCH -qemu rfc 0/3] hw/cxl: Add support for Scan Media Davidlohr Bueso
2023-04-26 2:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] hw/cxl: Add get scan media capabilities mailbox command support Davidlohr Bueso
2023-04-28 16:18 ` Fan Ni
2023-04-28 15:49 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-05-15 11:01 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-04-26 2:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] hw/cxl: Add scan media " Davidlohr Bueso
2023-04-28 16:42 ` Fan Ni
2023-04-28 19:45 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-05-15 11:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-04-26 2:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Davidlohr Bueso
2023-04-28 17:00 ` Fan Ni
2023-04-28 19:30 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-05-15 12:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-04-26 2:16 ` [PATCH -qemu rfc 0/3] hw/cxl: Add support for Scan Media Davidlohr Bueso
2023-05-15 12:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230515120157.00003d89@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox