From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cxl: Change 'struct cxl_memdev_state' *_perf_list to single 'struct cxl_dpa_perf'
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 11:32:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240205113206.00004f1f@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240201214731.1297389-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:47:29 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> In order to address the issue with being able to expose qos_class sysfs
> attributes under 'ram' and 'pmem' sub-directories, the attributes must
> be defined as static attributes rather than under driver->dev_groups.
> To avoid implementing locking for accessing the 'struct cxl_dpa_perf`
> lists, convert the list to a single 'struct cxl_dpa_perf' entry in
> preparation to move the attributes to statically defined.
>
> While theoretically a partition may have multiple qos_class via CDAT, this
> has not been encountered with testing on available hardware. The code is
> simplified for now to not support the complex case until a use case is
> needed to support that.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/65b200ba228f_2d43c29468@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch/
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
A few comments inline.
Jonathan
> ---
> v3:
> - Add to commit log about simplification (Dan)
> - Remove check for dev->driver (Dan)
> - Remove check for invalid qos_class (Dan)
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c | 81 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
> drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 4 +-
> drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 10 ++---
> drivers/cxl/mem.c | 28 ++------------
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> index 6fe11546889f..55b82dfd794b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> static void cxl_qos_match(struct cxl_port *root_port,
> - struct list_head *work_list,
> - struct list_head *discard_list)
> + struct cxl_dpa_perf *dpa_perf)
> {
> - struct cxl_dpa_perf *dpa_perf, *n;
> + int rc;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dpa_perf, n, work_list, list) {
> - int rc;
> + if (dpa_perf->qos_class == CXL_QOS_CLASS_INVALID)
> + return;
>
> - if (dpa_perf->qos_class == CXL_QOS_CLASS_INVALID)
> - return;
> -
> - rc = device_for_each_child(&root_port->dev,
> - (void *)&dpa_perf->qos_class,
> - match_cxlrd_qos_class);
> - if (!rc)
> - list_move_tail(&dpa_perf->list, discard_list);
> - }
> + rc = device_for_each_child(&root_port->dev,
Over aggressive wrap.
> + &dpa_perf->qos_class,
> + match_cxlrd_qos_class);
> + if (!rc)
> + reset_dpa_perf(dpa_perf);
I'm not particularly keen on a function that on failure to match resets
some internal state in one of it's inputs.
Would prefer to see this return a bool then the caller decide to reset it.
> }
>
> static int match_cxlrd_hb(struct device *dev, void *data)
> @@ -334,23 +312,10 @@ static int match_cxlrd_hb(struct device *dev, void *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int cxl_qos_class_verify(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> {
> struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
> struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlds);
> - LIST_HEAD(__discard);
> - struct list_head *discard __free(dpa_perf) = &__discard;
> struct cxl_port *root_port;
> int rc;
>
> @@ -363,16 +328,16 @@ static int cxl_qos_class_verify(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> root_port = &cxl_root->port;
>
> /* Check that the QTG IDs are all sane between end device and root decoders */
> - cxl_qos_match(root_port, &mds->ram_perf_list, discard);
> - cxl_qos_match(root_port, &mds->pmem_perf_list, discard);
> + cxl_qos_match(root_port, &mds->ram_perf);
> + cxl_qos_match(root_port, &mds->pmem_perf);
>
> /* Check to make sure that the device's host bridge is under a root decoder */
> rc = device_for_each_child(&root_port->dev,
> (void *)cxlmd->endpoint->host_bridge,
Why is the explicit void * cast needed? It's not removing const or anything like
that so usual c rules on it being fine to implicitly cast to void * should apply.
> match_cxlrd_hb);
> if (!rc) {
> - list_splice_tail_init(&mds->ram_perf_list, discard);
> - list_splice_tail_init(&mds->pmem_perf_list, discard);
> + reset_dpa_perf(&mds->ram_perf);
> + reset_dpa_perf(&mds->pmem_perf);
> }
>
> return rc;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240201214822epcas2p3062089e1281f483fb26eea3c80a71475@epcms2p3>
2024-02-01 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cxl: Change 'struct cxl_memdev_state' *_perf_list to single 'struct cxl_dpa_perf' Dave Jiang
2024-02-01 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cxl: Fix sysfs export of qos_class for memdev Dave Jiang
2024-02-05 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-05 18:23 ` Dave Jiang
2024-02-01 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cxl/test: Add support for qos_class checking Dave Jiang
2024-02-02 4:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cxl: Change 'struct cxl_memdev_state' *_perf_list to single 'struct cxl_dpa_perf' Wonjae Lee
2024-02-02 5:28 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-02 15:40 ` Dave Jiang
2024-02-02 15:51 ` Dave Jiang
2024-02-05 11:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-05 18:40 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-02 15:38 ` Dave Jiang
2024-02-05 11:32 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-02-05 18:05 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240205113206.00004f1f@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox