Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl: Remove checking of iter in cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates()
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:45:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229174520.000073e2@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229002542.634982-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>

On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:25:41 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:

> The while() loop in cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates() checks to see if
> 'iter' is valid as part of the condition breaking out of the loop. However,
> iter is being used before the check at the end of the while loop before
> the next iteration starts. Given that the loop doesn't expect the iter to
> be NULL because it stops before the root port, remove the iter check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index e59d9d37aa65..e1d30a885700 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -2142,7 +2142,7 @@ int cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates(struct cxl_port *port,
>  	 * port each iteration. If the parent is cxl root then there is
>  	 * nothing to gather.
>  	 */
> -	while (iter && !is_cxl_root(to_cxl_port(iter->dev.parent))) {
> +	while (!is_cxl_root(to_cxl_port(iter->dev.parent))) {
>  		combine_coordinates(&c, &dport->sw_coord);
>  		c.write_latency += dport->link_latency;
>  		c.read_latency += dport->link_latency;


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-29 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29  0:25 [PATCH 1/2] cxl: Remove checking of iter in cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates() Dave Jiang
2024-02-29  0:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] cxl: Add checks to access_coordinate calculation to fail missing data Dave Jiang
2024-02-29  0:35   ` Dan Williams
2024-02-29  0:39     ` Dave Jiang
2024-02-29  0:44       ` Dan Williams
2024-02-29 17:25         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-29 17:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-05 22:36     ` Dave Jiang
2024-03-06  0:18       ` Dave Jiang
2024-02-29  0:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] cxl: Remove checking of iter in cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates() Dan Williams
2024-02-29  0:36   ` Dave Jiang
2024-02-29 17:45 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240229174520.000073e2@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox