Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<jim.harris@samsung.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cxl/core/region: check interleave capability
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:16:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240419151638.000011e3@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240409022621.29115-1-yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>

On Mon,  8 Apr 2024 22:26:21 -0400
Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Since interleave capability is not checked, a target can be attached to
> region successfully even it does not support the interleave way or
> interleave granularity.
> 
> When accessing the memory, unexpected behavior occurs due to converting
> HPA to an error DPA:
> $ numactl -m 2 ls
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)

I'd drop this comment - a real device should have rejected the capacity.
We don't need the kernel change log to point out the qemu emulation is buggy :)

> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240327014653.26623-1-yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com
> Signed-off-by: Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>
A few minor things mostly around naming.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c    |  5 ++++
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h         |  2 ++
>  drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h      |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> index 7d97790b893d..5ac79d843a16 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ static void parse_hdm_decoder_caps(struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm)
>  		cxlhdm->interleave_mask |= GENMASK(11, 8);
>  	if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_14_12, hdm_cap))
>  		cxlhdm->interleave_mask |= GENMASK(14, 12);
> +	cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask = BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(4) | BIT(8);
> +	if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_3_6_12_WAY, hdm_cap))
> +		cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask |= BIT(3) | BIT(6) | BIT(12);
> +	if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_16_WAY, hdm_cap))
> +		cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask |= BIT(16);
>  }
>  
>  static bool should_emulate_decoders(struct cxl_endpoint_dvsec_info *info)
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 5c186e0a39b9..abc14fe1717e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -1210,6 +1210,41 @@ static int check_last_peer(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int check_interleave_cap(struct cxl_decoder *cxld, int iw, int ig)
> +{
> +	struct cxl_port *port = to_cxl_port(cxld->dev.parent);
> +	struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm = dev_get_drvdata(&port->dev);
> +	unsigned int interleave_mask;
> +	u8 eiw;
> +	u16 eig;
> +	int rc, start_pos, stop_pos;
> +
> +	rc = ways_to_eiw(iw, &eiw);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	if (!(cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask & BIT(iw)))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	rc = granularity_to_eig(ig, &eig);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	if (eiw >= 8)
> +		start_pos = eiw + eig - 1;
> +	else
> +		start_pos = eiw + eig + 7;
> +	stop_pos = eig + 8;

I'd like to see a comment with a specification reference for this
maths.  Probably the implementation note which oddly ended up in 
8.2.20.13 Decoder Protection. in r3.1

> +	if (stop_pos > start_pos)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	interleave_mask = GENMASK(start_pos, stop_pos);

I'd use high_pos and low_pos to avoid ambiguity around start
and stop and which is which (I thought this was backwards at first glance)

> +	if ((interleave_mask & cxlhdm->interleave_mask) != interleave_mask)
This is effectively checking for one not contained in the other. Can use
the perhaps simpler check of is the interleave_mask no overlapping with everything
outside of cxlhdm->interleave_mask

	if (interleave_mask & ~cxlhd->interleave_mask)
I think...

> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
>  				  struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  				  struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> @@ -1360,6 +1395,14 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
>  			return -ENXIO;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> +		rc = check_interleave_cap(cxld, iw, ig);
> +		if (rc) {
> +			dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev,
> +				"%s:%s iw: %d ig: %d is not supported\n",
> +				dev_name(port->uport_dev),
> +				dev_name(&port->dev), iw, ig);
> +			return rc;
> +		}
>  		cxld->interleave_ways = iw;
>  		cxld->interleave_granularity = ig;
>  		cxld->hpa_range = (struct range) {
> @@ -1796,6 +1839,14 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>  	int rc = -ENXIO;
>  
> +	rc = check_interleave_cap(&cxled->cxld, p->interleave_ways,
> +				  p->interleave_granularity);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s iw: %d ig: %d is not supported\n",
> +			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), p->interleave_ways,
> +			p->interleave_granularity);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
>  	if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
>  		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
>  			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 534e25e2f0a4..da8a487ededa 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
>  #define   CXL_HDM_DECODER_TARGET_COUNT_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
>  #define   CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_11_8 BIT(8)
>  #define   CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_14_12 BIT(9)
> +#define   CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_3_6_12_WAY BIT(11)
> +#define   CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_16_WAY BIT(12)
>  #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_CTRL_OFFSET 0x4
>  #define   CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE BIT(1)
>  #define CXL_HDM_DECODER0_BASE_LOW_OFFSET(i) (0x20 * (i) + 0x10)
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> index 20fb3b35e89e..1ec3e6285d41 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> @@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ struct cxl_hdm {
>  	unsigned int decoder_count;
>  	unsigned int target_count;
>  	unsigned int interleave_mask;
> +	unsigned int iw_cap_mask;
>  	struct cxl_port *port;
>  };
>  


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-09  2:26 [PATCH v3] cxl/core/region: check interleave capability Yao Xingtao
2024-04-17  6:30 ` Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)
2024-04-19 14:16 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-19 17:01 ` fan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240419151638.000011e3@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jim.harris@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox