From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<jim.harris@samsung.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cxl/core/region: check interleave capability
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:16:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240419151638.000011e3@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240409022621.29115-1-yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 22:26:21 -0400
Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Since interleave capability is not checked, a target can be attached to
> region successfully even it does not support the interleave way or
> interleave granularity.
>
> When accessing the memory, unexpected behavior occurs due to converting
> HPA to an error DPA:
> $ numactl -m 2 ls
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I'd drop this comment - a real device should have rejected the capacity.
We don't need the kernel change log to point out the qemu emulation is buggy :)
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240327014653.26623-1-yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com
> Signed-off-by: Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>
A few minor things mostly around naming.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c | 5 ++++
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++
> drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> index 7d97790b893d..5ac79d843a16 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ static void parse_hdm_decoder_caps(struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm)
> cxlhdm->interleave_mask |= GENMASK(11, 8);
> if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_14_12, hdm_cap))
> cxlhdm->interleave_mask |= GENMASK(14, 12);
> + cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask = BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(4) | BIT(8);
> + if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_3_6_12_WAY, hdm_cap))
> + cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask |= BIT(3) | BIT(6) | BIT(12);
> + if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_16_WAY, hdm_cap))
> + cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask |= BIT(16);
> }
>
> static bool should_emulate_decoders(struct cxl_endpoint_dvsec_info *info)
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 5c186e0a39b9..abc14fe1717e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -1210,6 +1210,41 @@ static int check_last_peer(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int check_interleave_cap(struct cxl_decoder *cxld, int iw, int ig)
> +{
> + struct cxl_port *port = to_cxl_port(cxld->dev.parent);
> + struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm = dev_get_drvdata(&port->dev);
> + unsigned int interleave_mask;
> + u8 eiw;
> + u16 eig;
> + int rc, start_pos, stop_pos;
> +
> + rc = ways_to_eiw(iw, &eiw);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (!(cxlhdm->iw_cap_mask & BIT(iw)))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + rc = granularity_to_eig(ig, &eig);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (eiw >= 8)
> + start_pos = eiw + eig - 1;
> + else
> + start_pos = eiw + eig + 7;
> + stop_pos = eig + 8;
I'd like to see a comment with a specification reference for this
maths. Probably the implementation note which oddly ended up in
8.2.20.13 Decoder Protection. in r3.1
> + if (stop_pos > start_pos)
> + return 0;
> +
> + interleave_mask = GENMASK(start_pos, stop_pos);
I'd use high_pos and low_pos to avoid ambiguity around start
and stop and which is which (I thought this was backwards at first glance)
> + if ((interleave_mask & cxlhdm->interleave_mask) != interleave_mask)
This is effectively checking for one not contained in the other. Can use
the perhaps simpler check of is the interleave_mask no overlapping with everything
outside of cxlhdm->interleave_mask
if (interleave_mask & ~cxlhd->interleave_mask)
I think...
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
> struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> @@ -1360,6 +1395,14 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> } else {
> + rc = check_interleave_cap(cxld, iw, ig);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev,
> + "%s:%s iw: %d ig: %d is not supported\n",
> + dev_name(port->uport_dev),
> + dev_name(&port->dev), iw, ig);
> + return rc;
> + }
> cxld->interleave_ways = iw;
> cxld->interleave_granularity = ig;
> cxld->hpa_range = (struct range) {
> @@ -1796,6 +1839,14 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> struct cxl_dport *dport;
> int rc = -ENXIO;
>
> + rc = check_interleave_cap(&cxled->cxld, p->interleave_ways,
> + p->interleave_granularity);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s iw: %d ig: %d is not supported\n",
> + dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), p->interleave_ways,
> + p->interleave_granularity);
> + return rc;
> + }
> if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
> dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
> dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 534e25e2f0a4..da8a487ededa 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_TARGET_COUNT_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_11_8 BIT(8)
> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_14_12 BIT(9)
> +#define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_3_6_12_WAY BIT(11)
> +#define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_16_WAY BIT(12)
> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_CTRL_OFFSET 0x4
> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE BIT(1)
> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER0_BASE_LOW_OFFSET(i) (0x20 * (i) + 0x10)
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> index 20fb3b35e89e..1ec3e6285d41 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> @@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ struct cxl_hdm {
> unsigned int decoder_count;
> unsigned int target_count;
> unsigned int interleave_mask;
> + unsigned int iw_cap_mask;
> struct cxl_port *port;
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 2:26 [PATCH v3] cxl/core/region: check interleave capability Yao Xingtao
2024-04-17 6:30 ` Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)
2024-04-19 14:16 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-19 17:01 ` fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240419151638.000011e3@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jim.harris@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox