From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] ACPI/NUMA: Add log messages for memory ranges found in CEDT
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:32:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240430163253.00006c6e@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240430092200.2335887-7-rrichter@amd.com>
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:21:59 +0200
Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> wrote:
> Adding a pr_info() when successfully adding a CFMWS memory range.
>
> Suggested-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Hmm. I'm a bit doubtful this will work for other architectures
as arm64 at least has two sets of memblocks and the holes probably
want to go in memblock.reserved rather than in memblock.memory.
I think we would want to reflect where the extra memblks was added.
However. I'm not 100% sure on what that ends up like as I've not
written an appropriate numa_fill_memblks() yet, so I guess for
now it's fine here, and maybe it will get pushed into the arch
specific code when a second architecture implements numa_fill_memblks()
if some architectures want to return more detailed info.
So, I've argued myself around to
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Jonathan
p.s. Unrelated whitespace change but I guess can cope with that...
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 76b39a6d3aef..34ecf2dc912f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -339,8 +339,12 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> * window.
> */
> modified = numa_fill_memblks(start, end);
> - if (modified != NUMA_NO_MEMBLK)
> + if (modified != NUMA_NO_MEMBLK) {
> + if (modified)
> + pr_info("CEDT: memblk extended [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> + (unsigned long long) start, (unsigned long long) end - 1);
> return 0;
> + }
>
> /* No SRAT description. Create a new node. */
> node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(*fake_pxm);
> @@ -355,8 +359,13 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> pr_warn("ACPI NUMA: Failed to add memblk for CFMWS node %d [mem %#llx-%#llx]\n",
> node, start, end);
> }
> +
> node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
>
> + pr_info("CEDT: Node %u PXM %u [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> + node, *fake_pxm,
> + (unsigned long long) start, (unsigned long long) end - 1);
> +
> /* Set the next available fake_pxm value */
> (*fake_pxm)++;
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 9:21 [PATCH v6 0/7] SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates Robert Richter
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 14:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-02 11:59 ` Robert Richter
2024-05-02 16:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:16 ` Alison Schofield
2024-05-02 12:11 ` Robert Richter
2024-04-30 16:42 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] ACPI/NUMA: Remove architecture dependent remainings Robert Richter
2024-04-30 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:01 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash acpi_numa_slit_init() into acpi_parse_slit() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:01 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() into acpi_parse_memory_affinity() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:01 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] ACPI/NUMA: Return memblk modification state from numa_fill_memblks() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 15:49 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 17:05 ` Dan Williams
2024-05-02 12:45 ` Robert Richter
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] ACPI/NUMA: Add log messages for memory ranges found in CEDT Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:32 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-30 15:49 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 17:14 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-30 9:22 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT) Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:55 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-02 12:53 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240430163253.00006c6e@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox