Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cxl: Calculate region bandwidth of targets with shared upstream link
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 14:46:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240501144613.00004008@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411181641.514075-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>

On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:16:41 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:

> For a topology where multiple targets sharing the same switch uplink, the
> bandwidth must be divided amongst all the sharing targets.
> cxl_rr->num_targets keeps track of the numbers of targets sharing the same
> upstream port. The current implementation accumulates targets during
> cxl_region_attach() and does not have the final number of targets until
> the last target is attached. If the upstream link is shared, accumulate
> bandwidth up to the switch upstream bandwidth.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20240405143242.0000363a@Huawei.com/
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Version info below the ---
Though it's your problem to fix that up commits anyway :)

Some passing code comments inline but as with Ira I can't see how this
works for anything involving more than one switch.

> 
> v2:
> - cxl_region_targets() -> cxl_port_shared_region_targets(). (Dan)
> - Use different method to calculate bandwidth. (Dan)
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c   | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/cxl/core/core.h   |  3 +++
>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c    | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 10 ++++++++
>  4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> index 4b717d2f5a9d..09f3e62e19a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> @@ -541,6 +541,36 @@ void cxl_coordinates_combine(struct access_coordinate *out,
>  
>  MODULE_IMPORT_NS(CXL);
>  
> +static int cxl_get_switch_uport_bandwidth(struct device *uport_dev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = uport_dev->parent;
> +
> +	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return cxl_pci_get_switch_usp_bandwidth(to_pci_dev(dev));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Calculate the bandwidth for the cxl region based on the number of targets
> + * that share an upstream switch. The function is called while targets are
> + * being attached for a region. If the number of targets is 1, then
> + * the target either does not have a upstream switch or it's the first target
> + * of the shared link. In this case, the bandwidth is the sum of the target
> + * bandwidth and the collected region bandwidth. If the targets from cxl_rr is
> + * greater than 1, then the bandwidth is the minimum of the switch upstream
> + * port bandwidth or the region plus the target bandwidth.
> + */
> +static unsigned int calculate_region_bw(int targets, unsigned int usp_bw,
> +					unsigned int ep_bw,
> +					unsigned int region_bw)
> +{
> +	if (targets == 1)
> +		return region_bw + ep_bw;
> +
> +	return min_t(unsigned int, usp_bw, region_bw + ep_bw);
Similar to what Ira said, I can't see how this works for more complex situations
(i.e. pretty much anything involving more than one switch in parallel.).

> +}
> +
>  void cxl_region_perf_data_calculate(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  				    struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
>  {
> @@ -551,7 +581,9 @@ void cxl_region_perf_data_calculate(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  			.start = cxled->dpa_res->start,
>  			.end = cxled->dpa_res->end,
>  	};
> +	struct cxl_port *port = cxlmd->endpoint;
>  	struct cxl_dpa_perf *perf;
> +	int usp_bw, targets;
>  
>  	switch (cxlr->mode) {
>  	case CXL_DECODER_RAM:
> @@ -569,6 +601,12 @@ void cxl_region_perf_data_calculate(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  	if (!range_contains(&perf->dpa_range, &dpa))
>  		return;
>  
> +	usp_bw = cxl_get_switch_uport_bandwidth(port->uport_dev);
> +	if (usp_bw > 0)
> +		targets = cxl_port_shared_region_targets(port, cxlr);
> +	else

Comment on why would be helpful.  I think it's because there wasn't
a switch upstream port in the path?

> +		targets = 1;
> +
>  	for (int i = 0; i < ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX; i++) {
>  		/* Get total bandwidth and the worst latency for the cxl region */
>  		cxlr->coord[i].read_latency = max_t(unsigned int,
> @@ -577,8 +615,14 @@ void cxl_region_perf_data_calculate(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  		cxlr->coord[i].write_latency = max_t(unsigned int,
>  						     cxlr->coord[i].write_latency,
>  						     perf->coord[i].write_latency);
> -		cxlr->coord[i].read_bandwidth += perf->coord[i].read_bandwidth;
> -		cxlr->coord[i].write_bandwidth += perf->coord[i].write_bandwidth;
> +		cxlr->coord[i].read_bandwidth =
> +			calculate_region_bw(targets, usp_bw,
> +					    perf->coord[i].read_bandwidth,
> +					    cxlr->coord[i].read_bandwidth);
> +		cxlr->coord[i].write_bandwidth =
> +			calculate_region_bw(targets, usp_bw,
> +					    perf->coord[i].write_bandwidth,
> +					    cxlr->coord[i].write_bandwidth);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> index bc5a95665aa0..99c1c24df671 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> @@ -89,9 +89,12 @@ enum cxl_poison_trace_type {
>  };
>  
>  long cxl_pci_get_latency(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +int cxl_pci_get_switch_usp_bandwidth(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  
>  int cxl_update_hmat_access_coordinates(int nid, struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  				       enum access_coordinate_class access);
>  bool cxl_need_node_perf_attrs_update(int nid);
>  
> +int cxl_port_shared_region_targets(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_region *cxlr);
> +
>  #endif /* __CXL_CORE_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 0df09bd79408..9281ed5a073d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -1045,3 +1045,38 @@ long cxl_pci_get_latency(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  
>  	return cxl_flit_size(pdev) * MEGA / bw;
>  }
> +
> +static int cxl_pci_get_bandwidth(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u16 lnksta;
> +	u32 width;
> +	int speed;
> +
> +	speed = pcie_link_speed_mbps(pdev);
> +	if (speed < 0)
> +		return 0;
> +	speed /= BITS_PER_BYTE;
> +
> +	pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnksta);
> +	width = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW, lnksta);
> +
> +	return speed * width;
> +}
> +

I'd add some comments. Otherwise expectation would be that
the pdev passed in would be the usp.

> +int cxl_pci_get_switch_usp_bandwidth(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;

You set this then change it before it's used.

> +	struct pci_dev *iter = pdev;
> +
	while (pci_pcie_type(iter) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
		dev = iter->dev.parent;
		if (!dev || !dev_is_pci(dev))
			return -ENODEV;
		iter = to_pci_dev(dev);
	}

	return cxl_pci_get_bandwidth(iter);

> +	do {
> +		if (pci_pcie_type(iter) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM)
> +			break;
> +
> +		dev = iter->dev.parent;
> +		if (!dev || !dev_is_pci(dev))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		iter = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	} while (1);
> +
> +	return cxl_pci_get_bandwidth(iter);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 5c186e0a39b9..5a1bca31d269 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,16 @@ static struct cxl_region_ref *cxl_rr_load(struct cxl_port *port,
>  	return xa_load(&port->regions, (unsigned long)cxlr);
>  }
>  
> +int cxl_port_shared_region_targets(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_region *cxlr)
> +{
> +	struct cxl_region_ref *cxl_rr = cxl_rr_load(port, cxlr);
> +
> +	if (!cxl_rr)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return cxl_rr->nr_targets;
> +}
> +
>  static int cxl_region_invalidate_memregion(struct cxl_region *cxlr)
>  {
>  	if (!cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion()) {


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-01 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-11 18:16 [PATCH v2] cxl: Calculate region bandwidth of targets with shared upstream link Dave Jiang
2024-04-23 23:37 ` Ira Weiny
2024-05-01 14:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-01 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240501144613.00004008@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox