Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
Cc: <kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<y-goto@fujitsu.com>, <mj@ucw.cz>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] cxl/core/regs: Add rcd_pcie_cap initialization at __rcrb_to_component()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:43:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610114322.000031b8@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610082222.22772-2-kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:22:21 +0900
"Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Add rcd_pcie_cap and its initialization at __rcrb_to_component() to cache
> the offset of cxl1.1 device link status information. By caching it, avoid 
> the walking memory map area to find the offset when output the register value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>

Hi.

This is getting closer, but a few minor comments inline on the implementation.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/core.h |  4 ++++
>  drivers/cxl/core/regs.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h       |  9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> index 3b64fb1b9ed0..42e3483b4a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev,
>  				    enum cxl_rcrb which);
>  u16 cxl_rcrb_to_aer(struct device *dev, resource_size_t rcrb);
>  
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_LIST_ID_MASK	GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_ID_MASK	GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_NEXT_MASK	GENMASK(15, 8)
> +
>  extern struct rw_semaphore cxl_dpa_rwsem;
>  extern struct rw_semaphore cxl_region_rwsem;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> index 372786f80955..cc1ce5e032e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,8 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
>  	u32 bar0, bar1;
>  	u16 cmd;
>  	u32 id;
> +	u16 offset;
> +	u32 cap_hdr;
>  
>  	if (which == CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM)
>  		rcrb += SZ_4K;
> @@ -537,6 +539,17 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
>  	cmd = readw(addr + PCI_COMMAND);
>  	bar0 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
>  	bar1 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1);
> +	offset = FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_LIST_ID_MASK, readw(addr + PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST));
> +	cap_hdr = readl(addr + offset);
> +	while ((FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_ID_MASK, cap_hdr)) != PCI_CAP_ID_EXP) {
> +		offset = FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_NEXT_MASK, cap_hdr);
> +		if (offset == 0 || offset > SZ_4K)
> +			break;
> +		cap_hdr = readl(addr + offset);
> +	}
> +	if (offset)
If offset > SZ_4K?  

I'd make it 0 at the check inside the loop.

> +		ri->rcd_pcie_cap = offset;
> +
>  	iounmap(addr);
>  	release_mem_region(rcrb, SZ_4K);
>  
> @@ -572,8 +585,19 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
>  resource_size_t cxl_rcd_component_reg_phys(struct device *dev,
>  					   struct cxl_dport *dport)
>  {
> +	void __iomem *dport_pcie_cap = NULL;
> +	resource_size_t rcd_pcie_offset, ret;
blank line here.

I'd also reduce the scope of rcd_pcie_offset.

>  	if (!dport->rch)
>  		return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> -	return __rcrb_to_component(dev, &dport->rcrb, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> +
> +	ret = __rcrb_to_component(dev, &dport->rcrb, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> +	if (dport->rcrb.rcd_pcie_cap) {
> +		rcd_pcie_offset = dport->rcrb.base + dport->rcrb.rcd_pcie_cap;
> +		dport_pcie_cap = devm_cxl_iomap_block(dev, rcd_pcie_offset,
> +											  sizeof(u8) * 0x42);

Something odd here with alignment. I guess tab width 4 rather than 8 in your editor?
Also, add a define for the 0x42 I think.

Directly assign into dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap having made change suggested below.



> +	}
> +	dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap = dport_pcie_cap;
Why not move this in the brackets?  I think you can rely on the regs
structuring being initialized to zero for the 'else' path.

> +
> +	return ret;
>  }

>  


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-10 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10  8:22 [PATCH v9 0/2] cxl: Export cxl1.1 device link status to sysfs Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-10  8:22 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] cxl/core/regs: Add rcd_pcie_cap initialization at __rcrb_to_component() Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-10 10:43   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-06-10  8:22 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] cxl/pci: Add sysfs attribute for CXL 1.1 device link status Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-10 10:46   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240610114322.000031b8@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    --cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox