From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
Cc: <kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<y-goto@fujitsu.com>, <mj@ucw.cz>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] cxl/core/regs: Add rcd_pcie_cap initialization at __rcrb_to_component()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:43:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610114322.000031b8@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610082222.22772-2-kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:22:21 +0900
"Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Add rcd_pcie_cap and its initialization at __rcrb_to_component() to cache
> the offset of cxl1.1 device link status information. By caching it, avoid
> the walking memory map area to find the offset when output the register value.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
Hi.
This is getting closer, but a few minor comments inline on the implementation.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/core.h | 4 ++++
> drivers/cxl/core/regs.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 9 +++++++++
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> index 3b64fb1b9ed0..42e3483b4a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev,
> enum cxl_rcrb which);
> u16 cxl_rcrb_to_aer(struct device *dev, resource_size_t rcrb);
>
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_LIST_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_NEXT_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> +
> extern struct rw_semaphore cxl_dpa_rwsem;
> extern struct rw_semaphore cxl_region_rwsem;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> index 372786f80955..cc1ce5e032e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,8 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
> u32 bar0, bar1;
> u16 cmd;
> u32 id;
> + u16 offset;
> + u32 cap_hdr;
>
> if (which == CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM)
> rcrb += SZ_4K;
> @@ -537,6 +539,17 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
> cmd = readw(addr + PCI_COMMAND);
> bar0 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
> bar1 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1);
> + offset = FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_LIST_ID_MASK, readw(addr + PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST));
> + cap_hdr = readl(addr + offset);
> + while ((FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_ID_MASK, cap_hdr)) != PCI_CAP_ID_EXP) {
> + offset = FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_NEXT_MASK, cap_hdr);
> + if (offset == 0 || offset > SZ_4K)
> + break;
> + cap_hdr = readl(addr + offset);
> + }
> + if (offset)
If offset > SZ_4K?
I'd make it 0 at the check inside the loop.
> + ri->rcd_pcie_cap = offset;
> +
> iounmap(addr);
> release_mem_region(rcrb, SZ_4K);
>
> @@ -572,8 +585,19 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
> resource_size_t cxl_rcd_component_reg_phys(struct device *dev,
> struct cxl_dport *dport)
> {
> + void __iomem *dport_pcie_cap = NULL;
> + resource_size_t rcd_pcie_offset, ret;
blank line here.
I'd also reduce the scope of rcd_pcie_offset.
> if (!dport->rch)
> return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> - return __rcrb_to_component(dev, &dport->rcrb, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> +
> + ret = __rcrb_to_component(dev, &dport->rcrb, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> + if (dport->rcrb.rcd_pcie_cap) {
> + rcd_pcie_offset = dport->rcrb.base + dport->rcrb.rcd_pcie_cap;
> + dport_pcie_cap = devm_cxl_iomap_block(dev, rcd_pcie_offset,
> + sizeof(u8) * 0x42);
Something odd here with alignment. I guess tab width 4 rather than 8 in your editor?
Also, add a define for the 0x42 I think.
Directly assign into dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap having made change suggested below.
> + }
> + dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap = dport_pcie_cap;
Why not move this in the brackets? I think you can rely on the regs
structuring being initialized to zero for the 'else' path.
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 8:22 [PATCH v9 0/2] cxl: Export cxl1.1 device link status to sysfs Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-10 8:22 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] cxl/core/regs: Add rcd_pcie_cap initialization at __rcrb_to_component() Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-10 10:43 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-06-10 8:22 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] cxl/pci: Add sysfs attribute for CXL 1.1 device link status Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-10 10:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240610114322.000031b8@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com \
--cc=kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mj@ucw.cz \
--cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox