From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D96910A39 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718986831; cv=none; b=nOBIC+kc6z1cgd6v3ZPLnbGqpxJsF2HlIE1k60mapSqSY/sdk7YI8eOum/eLA/R6vLR/r86pWWPJ5jEmyJPdXEz/xJ134Mwa3foUqp4yfefD1zGeNz+ajFkNY9cCuSM68KhV5rClEtA8PK4RhAUE2o6jVYTh0cls5lMCR4Ttsq4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718986831; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/Co0zMQI/Spa310mO0fkZ0PfkTB0P56AUmfD1wRkgIM=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tNiCHv2qJZQmVin4y7d3qf/Jxpy4yBs8z0Wm0M9A30WLxZvyI9LJ5qZmjYnzUEWzGHxKr44YWvxs7bCRRcYavXr0n4AVimWDZVT6Je98yOxnJ8t5sbEbpU7AnOrhklCjVp8PBqwwcHP/bMAAVarst8GMfWgb1BB3QMD8yPDptp4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W5Mwx2tcSz6K98T; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:18:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59172140B38; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:20:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.122.19.247) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:20:15 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:20:14 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , Markus Armbruster , , , , , Richard Henderson CC: , Dave Jiang , Huang Ying , Paolo Bonzini , , , Michael Roth , Ani Sinha Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 qemu 00/11] acpi: NUMA nodes for CXL HB as GP + complex NUMA test Message-ID: <20240621172014.00007b7c@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20240620160324.109058-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240620160324.109058-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.29; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:03:08 +0100 Jonathan Cameron wrote: > v3: Thanks to Richard for help debugging BE issue and to Igor for > finding a bunch of other thing to improve via the context in > the fix patch. I forgot to mention that his time I ran the bios tables test on an emulated x86_64 machine on top of an emulated s390 (with the timeouts massively increased as it took about 2 hours). Hopefully no more surprises!