Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful?

Borislav Petkov
2024-07-29T13:39:00Z

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 01:45:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> One of the key bits of feedback we've had on that series is that it
> should be integrated with EDAC. Part of the reason being need to get
> appropriate RAS expert review.

If you mean me with that, my only question back then was: if you're going to
integrate it somewhere and instead of defining something completely new - you
can simply reuse what's there. That's why I suggested EDAC.

IOW, the question becomes, why should it be a completely new thing and not
part of EDAC?

That's all.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.