From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED13209F59 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729090055; cv=none; b=ZO1ZAXLHDzwCYFxC2714NwIOrBkZrecF7d1wpXpF6CQ43v6aVYjkvn+iYQiuwGA9v4QoMMtRNaw0bgJAsqGagbTjjPLYflJEe3r1dBa3HVsbXEEVJVzi9bmSEMCgreroBSfcJAmpp1RFx35tc2zlmttIQtVIgb/7e3gQh2gh8bs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729090055; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G6DYu+Ut6uImgxARAoTes7kQVehZ74s8+h6WJb1ZxhE=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uvyCyZ6LndV2L72+oAC4sPn0pry31s3zdk7S+38RTE/T4Estz68Wdy6dJk0Knzo037PcsI/8y3n37zRVPMi58YAuSrzQfxLgxHgrPZckntEmmp/KcjuogK3yC75nfBEaERihbsZvZl3hLd1U9obCl5LyySBp6bcRvj12pfbP/aM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=Huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=Huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XTDGV6jthz6D9BK; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 22:42:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D6E71400DD; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 22:47:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:47:28 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:47:27 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Alison Schofield CC: Dave Jiang , , , , , , , , Alejandro Lucero , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] cxl: Move mailbox related bits to the same context Message-ID: <20241016154727.000027f8@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240905223711.1990186-1-dave.jiang@intel.com> <20240905223711.1990186-3-dave.jiang@intel.com> <20241014155154.00001d5a@Huawei.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.183) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:36:31 -0700 Alison Schofield wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:51:54PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:35:46 -0700 > > Dave Jiang wrote: > > > > > Create a new 'struct cxl_mailbox' and move all mailbox related bits to > > > it. This allows isolation of all CXL mailbox data in order to export > > > some of the calls to external kernel callers and avoid exporting of CXL > > > driver specific bits such has device states. The allocation of > > > 'struct cxl_mailbox' is also split out with cxl_mailbox_create() so the > > > mailbox can be created independently. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni > > > Reviewed-by: Alejandro Lucero > > > Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield > > > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240724185649.2574627-2-dave.jiang@intel.com > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang > > > > LGTM. > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > > > > Note this is currently being carried in Shiju's RAS features set > > as well. What is the merge plan? My preference is an immutable branch > > that Borislav could pull into the EDAC tree and on which we can base > > other stuff in CXL > > That is a branch based on 6.12-rc1 directly with an appropriate tag > > that Shiju's patch set can refer to. > > > This set was merged in 6.12. Ah. Shiju, seems you have an old base. Fix that for next version of the RAS features > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jonathan > >