From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from iguana.tulip.relay.mailchannels.net (iguana.tulip.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.218.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62DDA26BDB9 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 04:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=23.83.218.253 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739248272; cv=pass; b=F7ZR2c9QcBMApviQwUuMbkXQyLSClM/rHFJ0tOfAoMlWlYeNWWkABQKUch1R5oFEwQDREAg+Z0x9niDI6HYl/P48gAeJTt6YjfVmXSF5q8K98dZvrknyw36dTBVW5NrISGvlz1k9rR0qOnqghand6zqG0XrnUDkivrvTVdsRpEI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739248272; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1u1evFtQKGY6ys9yWCLGiaLYxkvYIz2dxZICgRacoHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=itpHtgXr+XS4mrHYNlBPQqO6DG5wYBX4H7EXsoTer4AuWwi+xWqGSdnz7h/w+zGRH+SIQA4/v6fH7sPZojIoq16KarJUkhRyQYsc178u+EaA8Y7qHvmdGtPl2l1mPkCuImaRq73kE5y1pBaYM0WSbvA/V6q5mZlm/1CWV0jDw+A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stgolabs.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=stgolabs.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stgolabs.net header.i=@stgolabs.net header.b=Io2fNahb; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=23.83.218.253 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stgolabs.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=stgolabs.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stgolabs.net header.i=@stgolabs.net header.b="Io2fNahb" X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E494161E29; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 04:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a260.dreamhost.com (trex-2.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.126.220.89]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E163A162011; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 04:13:33 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1739247214; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=xOLnHk+10XYIG2aMQ6NQwb8WzLdHzBy5sPmegf+k6vH1jzGBQmseuXHPGSjT5/hncyto92 kS/Y63/e0YngC/tIi8EUGQaMtDzShBbPGivlpJjxxeeuzxbTNGEbykS15T8WsEoYanVOpo ba9fog9NDnk8Do1hd8IhZfNwR5MqcCZutqqrkc+kwe9XUl35wE+GL0aTeMwiM8PEFOoIwr 2CGwEL7LbljCsIIHLuulg2Kxgdb8L1bFe9lwTDdhSlI4e6gs7FL8xPMBUMGBb+ULXPKDuA rcc3gCFvGdYRcdv5Ue+MmnrcSMvmyMElAjDg0pEpIRjS3SdfkRHlbkoCr6yMnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1739247214; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=1u1evFtQKGY6ys9yWCLGiaLYxkvYIz2dxZICgRacoHU=; b=hMP0okX7AGU64KOF65Fhrn0jk7hmiWtwZHKG8UjAPqMB4OX4AT91dBUMWuINNYvbkGFKDG 3ukTwIA441M4Ep5kd37Jd0Q8why4s6h8OXU9CVPLaecgmkx61rPBmAw9tw5g9r/0jnVOZc GvfYOZWFwbNplozGvFcbVTTQIPmBNsaNkcJUfDbM8jBuNWl2uLVxaRG46WZwvgTB53pakS kZHd306OgqmLejuY4djOUu6GmmauBW3kDpHz56zeNstW2BeELplDc1+TBoLhkLhY2xa+KC DAY4E4GAShGdaAOMnFRfARjL4ctoqGxsNAd1JFiEN6M8PH/Jd8x6M5guN5BqCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-587f8d7697-76bcz; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=dave@stgolabs.net X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Dime-Bitter: 05723ce17d41e7ce_1739247214192_2591481593 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1739247214192:3729780211 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1739247214192 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a260.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.126.220.89 (trex/7.0.2); Tue, 11 Feb 2025 04:13:34 +0000 Received: from offworld (ip72-199-50-187.sd.sd.cox.net [72.199.50.187]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dave@stgolabs.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a260.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4YsSjn0vLYzLG; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:13:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stgolabs.net; s=dreamhost; t=1739247213; bh=1u1evFtQKGY6ys9yWCLGiaLYxkvYIz2dxZICgRacoHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Content-Type; b=Io2fNahbikLZagRjgemRzil1IMqFyLYFXOqSg7uCvCqOjcugv9NQfeA4gfL37253V Q37xPYoW3A/2PpZtg6cg8M9kFvCPp6rB7+MLRULtk1Lnrt7E3FWb17mDvvbjJv49r6 GSeQa3oF3P1kbTTRkqzVRwKp3/BHNta7U36jEmI+rHdUpYspRsWCuwj4AvJXpV39fz 8LrmtBC6BX/5x7fiRFgSq7Bp+EmEwAFtrB7SzRAG671H/t8U5zUcZ5RcK0lMmhqix3 v1YsD1lvz5ET3/RqY4MezTl66rg2e3usyJoQnx/qJnRccwJdclYQrwyUwOQ2QvmrYL k3I8vNvUR8OXg== Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:13:28 -0800 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Dave Jiang Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, alison.schofield@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, seven.yi.lee@gmail.com, a.manzanares@samsung.com, fan.ni@samsung.com, anisa.su@samsung.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/testing/cxl: Set Shutdown State support Message-ID: <20250211041328.f63g36mlitrfxvik@offworld> References: <20250205040842.1253616-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20250205040842.1253616-3-dave@stgolabs.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20220429 On Mon, 10 Feb 2025, Dave Jiang wrote: > > >On 2/4/25 9:08 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> Add support to emulate the CXL Set Shutdown State operation. > >Should the CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_SHUTDOWN_STATE support be added as well so the cxl_test can excercise the sysfs attrib and other parts of patch 1? CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_SHUTDOWN_STATE is unused altogether - you might be thinking of CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_HEALTH_INFO? (which is already supported by the mock device) Thanks, Davidlohr