From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDDA1A5B85 for ; Tue, 20 May 2025 12:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747744371; cv=none; b=cXatIRXdSZuYbEQ/CVE+wau9rmaOhjBsOTKj25+DI+Ut4jWIPToLBHLdIpYR/8RoutwJ5rnPFn9VHkVB1qVQlK5ZBOTvv2hXzsuKA/IxsAx0J9aH8ptCsSSwQHseQ8b92iOjVooKS7J8Hqs4S8GGzps6BM5zlm+GvmHz32KBb4E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747744371; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aIi2WTPS6zZeXfCMqNIFMbnnrL/ilxXRD2ZHViJMfwc=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uTGa+T1g5D+YmNwEdgSO3gtbwgNT9Do58IN98qlV+/psmMFJkSeBj8AN7BCCtGywInpeuZp7Q6EBOT+0zbtEEGqsu8iQt8+eI/yQn7rO3Z8nP/s6J0i0U6HV9Felk9nQyEO2aAfWNag0So+ibpBAqItZPHe+GQjTG6CsRSrETw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4b1v3043t8z6M4r5; Tue, 20 May 2025 20:27:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E86814050C; Tue, 20 May 2025 20:32:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 20 May 2025 14:32:46 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 13:32:44 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Dave Jiang CC: , Dan Williams , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] cxl: Change sslbis handler to only handle single dport Message-ID: <20250520133244.00004cc4@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250507004310.3536991-8-dave.jiang@intel.com> References: <20250507004310.3536991-1-dave.jiang@intel.com> <20250507004310.3536991-8-dave.jiang@intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.9) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Tue, 6 May 2025 17:43:07 -0700 Dave Jiang wrote: > While cxl_switch_parse_cdat() is harmless to be run multiple times, it is > not efficient in the current scheme where one dport is being updated at > a time by the memdev probe path. Change the input parameter to the > specific dport being updated to pick up the SSLBIS information for just > that dport. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang Seems reasonable. Any reason not to yank this one out before the rest of the series as a bit of cleanup? Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron