From: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nifan.cxl@gmail.com,
dave@stgolabs.net, vishak.g@samsung.com, krish.reddy@samsung.com,
a.manzanares@samsung.com, alok.rathore@samsung.com,
cpgs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:33:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729130325.pjv5cr6p4wggedgt@test-PowerEdge-R740xd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725155912.0000551d@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5167 bytes --]
On 25/07/25 03:59PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:13:38 +0530
>Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> -added assert-deassert PERST implementation
>> for physical ports (both USP and DSP's).
>> -assert PERST involves bg operation for holding 100ms.
>> -reset PPB implementation for physical ports.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
>Hi Arpit,
>
>Minor comments inline.
>
>We have plenty of time given where the qemu cycle is, so no huge rush
>for a v3.
>
>Jonathan
>
>> +static struct PCIDevice *cxl_find_port_dev(uint8_t pn, CXLCCI *cci)
>> +{
>> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>> + PCIBus *bus = &PCI_BRIDGE(cci->d)->sec_bus;
>> +
>> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
>> + CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_USP) {
>> + PCIDevice *usp_dev = pci_bridge_get_device(bus);
>> + return usp_dev;
>
>As below.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
>> + CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_DSP) {
>> + PCIDevice *dsp_dev = pcie_find_port_by_pn(bus, pn);
>> + return dsp_dev;
>
>What benefit do we get from a local variable?
>
thanks for pointing out.
>> + }
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* CXL r3.2 Section 7.6.7.1.3: Get Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) */
>> +static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
>> + uint8_t *payload_in,
>> + size_t len_in,
>> + uint8_t *payload_out,
>> + size_t *len_out,
>> + CXLCCI *cci)
>> +{
>> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>> + PCIDevice *dev;
>> + uint8_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>> +
>> + struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
>> + uint8_t ppb_id;
>> + uint8_t ports_op;
>> + } QEMU_PACKED *in = (void *)payload_in;
>> +
>> + if (len_in < sizeof(*in)) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH;
>> + }
>> +
>> + uint8_t pn = in->ppb_id;
>
>Avoid inline declarations of local variables.
>
got it.
>> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].port_id != pn) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev = cxl_find_port_dev(pn, cci);
>> + if (!dev) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (in->ports_op) {
>> + case 0:
>> + ret = assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + ret = deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
>> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> + device_cold_reset(&dev->qdev);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
>> @@ -3810,4 +3932,17 @@ void cxl_initialize_usp_mctpcci(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *d, DeviceState *intf,
>> cci->intf = intf;
>> cxl_init_cci(cci, payload_max);
>> cxl_set_phy_port_info(cci);
>> + /* physical port control */
>> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>
>Still sticking to the old style c option of declarations at the top of the scope.
>
okay
>> + for (int i = 0; i < CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS; i++) {
>> + qemu_mutex_init(&pp->pports.perst[i].lock);
>> + pp->pports.perst[i].issued_assert_perst = false;
>> + /*
>> + * Assert PERST involves physical port to be in
>> + * hold reset phase for minimum 100ms. No other
>> + * physcial port control requests are entertained
>> + * until Deassert PERST command.
>> + */
>> + pp->pports.perst[i].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
>> + }
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
>> index 1fa6cf7536..bb47e671eb 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
>> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
>> (1 << 16))
>>
>> #define CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS 256
>> +#define ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS 100 /* Assert - Deassert PERST */
>>
>> #define LINK_STATE_FLAG_LANE_REVERSED BIT(0)
>> #define LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED BIT(1)
>> @@ -203,10 +204,19 @@ struct cxl_phy_port_info {
>> uint8_t supported_ld_count;
>> } QEMU_PACKED;
>>
>> +/* Assert - Deassert PERST */
>> +struct pperst {
>
>Prefix this name. pperst is a PCIE thing so it may otherwise end up confusing.
>
okay
>> + bool issued_assert_perst;
>> + QemuMutex lock;
>
>Good practice to add a comment to say exactly what data this lock is protecting.
>
got it.
>> + uint64_t asrt_time;
>> + QemuThread asrt_thread; /* thread for 100ms delay */
>> +};
>> +
>> struct phy_port {
>> uint8_t num_ports;
>> uint8_t active_port_bitmask[0x20];
>> struct cxl_phy_port_info pport_info[CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS];
>> + struct pperst perst[CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS];
>> };
>>
>> /* CXL r3.1 Table 8-34: Command Return Codes */
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250710144348epcas5p1842ad24e3de24dd7048b0db9dfbe6455@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-07-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] FM-API Physical switch command set support Arpit Kumar
2025-07-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hw/cxl: Refactored Identify Switch Device & Get Physical Port State Arpit Kumar
2025-07-25 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 12:58 ` Arpit Kumar
2025-07-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) Arpit Kumar
2025-07-25 14:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 13:03 ` Arpit Kumar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729130325.pjv5cr6p4wggedgt@test-PowerEdge-R740xd \
--to=arpit1.kumar@samsung.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox