Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nifan.cxl@gmail.com,
	dave@stgolabs.net, vishak.g@samsung.com, krish.reddy@samsung.com,
	a.manzanares@samsung.com, alok.rathore@samsung.com,
	cpgs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:33:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729130325.pjv5cr6p4wggedgt@test-PowerEdge-R740xd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725155912.0000551d@huawei.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5167 bytes --]

On 25/07/25 03:59PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:13:38 +0530
>Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> -added assert-deassert PERST implementation
>>  for physical ports (both USP and DSP's).
>> -assert PERST involves bg operation for holding 100ms.
>> -reset PPB implementation for physical ports.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
>Hi Arpit,
>
>Minor comments inline.
>
>We have plenty of time given where the qemu cycle is, so no huge rush
>for a v3.
>
>Jonathan
>
>> +static struct PCIDevice *cxl_find_port_dev(uint8_t pn, CXLCCI *cci)
>> +{
>> +    CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>> +    PCIBus *bus = &PCI_BRIDGE(cci->d)->sec_bus;
>> +
>> +    if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
>> +        CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_USP) {
>> +        PCIDevice *usp_dev = pci_bridge_get_device(bus);
>> +        return usp_dev;
>
>As below.
>
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
>> +        CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_DSP) {
>> +        PCIDevice *dsp_dev = pcie_find_port_by_pn(bus, pn);
>> +        return dsp_dev;
>
>What benefit do we get from a local variable?
>
thanks for pointing out.
>> +    }
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* CXL r3.2 Section 7.6.7.1.3: Get Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) */
>> +static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
>> +                                            uint8_t *payload_in,
>> +                                            size_t len_in,
>> +                                            uint8_t *payload_out,
>> +                                            size_t *len_out,
>> +                                            CXLCCI *cci)
>> +{
>> +   CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>> +   PCIDevice *dev;
>> +   uint8_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>> +
>> +   struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
>> +        uint8_t ppb_id;
>> +        uint8_t ports_op;
>> +    } QEMU_PACKED *in = (void *)payload_in;
>> +
>> +    if (len_in < sizeof(*in)) {
>> +        return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    uint8_t pn = in->ppb_id;
>
>Avoid inline declarations of local variables.
>
got it.
>> +    if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].port_id != pn) {
>> +        return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    dev = cxl_find_port_dev(pn, cci);
>> +    if (!dev) {
>> +        return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    switch (in->ports_op) {
>> +    case 0:
>> +        ret = assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>> +        break;
>> +    case 1:
>> +        ret = deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>> +        break;
>> +    case 2:
>> +        if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
>> +            pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
>> +            return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> +        }
>> +        device_cold_reset(&dev->qdev);
>> +        break;
>> +    default:
>> +        return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
>> +    }
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>
>> @@ -3810,4 +3932,17 @@ void cxl_initialize_usp_mctpcci(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *d, DeviceState *intf,
>>      cci->intf = intf;
>>      cxl_init_cci(cci, payload_max);
>>      cxl_set_phy_port_info(cci);
>> +    /* physical port control */
>> +    CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>
>Still sticking to the old style c option of declarations at the top of the scope.
>
okay
>> +    for (int i = 0; i < CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS; i++) {
>> +        qemu_mutex_init(&pp->pports.perst[i].lock);
>> +        pp->pports.perst[i].issued_assert_perst = false;
>> +        /*
>> +         * Assert PERST involves physical port to be in
>> +         * hold reset phase for minimum 100ms. No other
>> +         * physcial port control requests are entertained
>> +         * until Deassert PERST command.
>> +         */
>> +         pp->pports.perst[i].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
>> +    }
>>  }
>> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
>> index 1fa6cf7536..bb47e671eb 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
>> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
>>                    (1 << 16))
>>
>>  #define CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS 256
>> +#define ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS 100 /* Assert - Deassert PERST */
>>
>>  #define LINK_STATE_FLAG_LANE_REVERSED    BIT(0)
>>  #define LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED   BIT(1)
>> @@ -203,10 +204,19 @@ struct cxl_phy_port_info {
>>      uint8_t supported_ld_count;
>>  } QEMU_PACKED;
>>
>> +/* Assert - Deassert PERST */
>> +struct pperst {
>
>Prefix this name. pperst is a PCIE thing so it may otherwise end up confusing.
>
okay
>> +    bool issued_assert_perst;
>> +    QemuMutex lock;
>
>Good practice to add a comment to say exactly what data this lock is protecting.
>
got it.
>> +    uint64_t asrt_time;
>> +    QemuThread asrt_thread; /* thread for 100ms delay */
>> +};
>> +
>>  struct phy_port {
>>      uint8_t num_ports;
>>      uint8_t active_port_bitmask[0x20];
>>      struct cxl_phy_port_info pport_info[CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS];
>> +    struct pperst perst[CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS];
>>  };
>>
>>  /* CXL r3.1 Table 8-34: Command Return Codes */
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-29 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250710144348epcas5p1842ad24e3de24dd7048b0db9dfbe6455@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-07-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] FM-API Physical switch command set support Arpit Kumar
2025-07-10 14:43   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hw/cxl: Refactored Identify Switch Device & Get Physical Port State Arpit Kumar
2025-07-25 14:54     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 12:58       ` Arpit Kumar
2025-07-10 14:43   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) Arpit Kumar
2025-07-25 14:59     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 13:03       ` Arpit Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250729130325.pjv5cr6p4wggedgt@test-PowerEdge-R740xd \
    --to=arpit1.kumar@samsung.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
    --cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox