From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614292E06D2 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765988324; cv=none; b=AwogjaYps9nFJGUu/DFta4autlSRfCsr/vdOcroagpNtIzxn5sFpLGPdFQjFr/yyqS7dmsrx+isMh/dvUu3+2jWwXjZx0bFAmXpIiHrvWMzHUhimhybOmw8WeTqNQ08/HdcEUZk03mb6YYFHsviYc/Dlk8ZfNqsTqsh3zNxtRh8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765988324; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rGLN1HFrEyVDEQ3Jtkf7kWDDwJ6TlgtI4zHWSfJj38g=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pVvasNUYXqn1oxiP8miiGhjCKvA2grlmQcNHakMihgfhzgVdjQLiCQcoFfn78AOmxKaoNeTFCEYRTJBscBpX3i2k81mqZgREz+R4Pp8lCENwSEwWSFJAGja5G8k9V641phJDMly3VqBTkXBRTfWKEx6WPSMaY4fHWbR65Vrwd0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.107]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dWf9G70L8zJ467g; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:18:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.146.113]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F77840570; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:18:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:18:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:18:39 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Ben Cheatham CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] cxl: Replace cxl_mem_find_port() with cxl_dev_find_port() Message-ID: <20251217161839.00002a11@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20251111214032.8188-7-Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com> References: <20251111214032.8188-1-Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com> <20251111214032.8188-7-Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500011.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.215) To dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:40:21 -0600 Ben Cheatham wrote: > Change cxl_mem_find_port() to take a struct device * instead of a struct > cxl_memdev * in preparation for adding cache devices to the port > hierarchy. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Cheatham Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Maybe we'll bikeshed the name in a future version though.