From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cxl/port: Fix use after free of parent_port in cxl_detach_ep()
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 11:53:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260227115308.0000249b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260226184439.1732841-1-alison.schofield@intel.com>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:44:36 -0800
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> wrote:
> cxl_detach_ep() is called during bottom-up removal when all CXL memory
> devices beneath a switch port have been removed. For each port in the
> hierarchy it locks both the port and its parent, removes the endpoint,
> and if the port is now empty, marks it dead and unregisters the port
> by calling delete_switch_port(). There are two places during this work
> where the parent_port may be used after freeing:
>
> First, a concurrent detach may have already processed a port by the
> time a second worker finds it via bus_find_device(). Without pinning
> parent_port, it may already be freed when we discover port->dead and
> attempt to unlock the parent_port. In a production kernel that's a
> silent memory corruption, with lock debug, it looks like this:
>
> []DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != get_current())
> []WARNING: kernel/locking/mutex.c:949 at __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x1ee/0x310
> []Call Trace:
> []mutex_unlock+0xd/0x20
> []cxl_detach_ep+0x180/0x400 [cxl_core]
> []devm_action_release+0x10/0x20
> []devres_release_all+0xa8/0xe0
> []device_unbind_cleanup+0xd/0xa0
> []really_probe+0x1a6/0x3e0
>
> Second, delete_switch_port() releases three devm actions registered
> against parent_port. The last of those is unregister_port() and it
> calls device_unregister() on the child port, which can cascade. If
> parent_port is now also empty the device core may unregister and free
> it too. So by the time delete_switch_port() returns, parent_port may
> be free, and the subsequent device_unlock(&parent_port->dev) operates
> on freed memory. The kernel log looks same as above, with a different
> offset in cxl_detach_ep().
>
> Both of these issues stem from the absence of a lifetime guarantee
> between a child port and its parent port.
>
> Establish a lifetime rule for ports: child ports hold a reference to
> their parent device until release. Take the reference when the port
> is allocated and drop it when released. This ensures the parent is
> valid for the full lifetime of the child and eliminates the use after
> free window in cxl_detach_ep().
>
> This is easily reproduced with a reload of cxl_acpi in QEMU with CXL
> devices present.
>
> Fixes: 2345df54249c ("cxl/memdev: Fix endpoint port removal")
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
New rule makes sense to me and implementation looks good.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 18:44 [PATCH v4] cxl/port: Fix use after free of parent_port in cxl_detach_ep() Alison Schofield
2026-02-27 11:53 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-02-28 7:04 ` Li Ming
2026-03-03 0:05 ` Alison Schofield
2026-03-03 20:36 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260227115308.0000249b@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox