From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: <dave.jiang@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<gourry@gourry.net>, <dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com>,
<anisa.su@samsung.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cxl: Add Back-Invalidate register definitions and structures
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:57:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260320145749.0000656c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260315202741.3264295-2-dave@stgolabs.net>
On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 13:27:36 -0700
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> Add CXL Back-Invalidate (BI) capability IDs, register definitions for
> the BI Route Table and BI Decoder capability structures, and associated
> fields. This includes HDM decoder coherency capability and control fields
> needed to support HDM-DB (device-managed coherency with back-invalidate).
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/cxl/cxl.h b/include/cxl/cxl.h
> index fa7269154620..74be940364e1 100644
> --- a/include/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/include/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -34,10 +34,12 @@ struct cxl_regs {
> * Common set of CXL Component register block base pointers
> * @hdm_decoder: CXL 2.0 8.2.5.12 CXL HDM Decoder Capability Structure
> * @ras: CXL 2.0 8.2.5.9 CXL RAS Capability Structure
> + * @bi: CXL 3.2 8.2.4.26/27 CXL BI Capability Structure
Whilst it is indeed one or the other depending on whether we are upstream or
downstream ports, smashing them into a single entry in here seems liable
to generate long term confusion.
Other than a bit of storage, given this is optional anyway I'm guessing it
doesn't cost us much to have bi_rt and bi_decoder?
I think we just hit the
if (!mi->rmap->valid) check and continue in cxl_map_component_regs().
I also don't really think it's our problem to check for hardware that
surfaces these caps on the wrong type of devices. We'll map
it but not use it.
> */
> struct_group_tagged(cxl_component_regs, component,
> void __iomem *hdm_decoder;
> void __iomem *ras;
> + void __iomem *bi;
> );
> /*
> * Common set of CXL Device register block base pointers
> @@ -80,6 +82,7 @@ struct cxl_reg_map {
> struct cxl_component_reg_map {
> struct cxl_reg_map hdm_decoder;
> struct cxl_reg_map ras;
> + struct cxl_reg_map bi;
> };
>
> struct cxl_device_reg_map {
> @@ -162,6 +165,7 @@ struct cxl_dpa_partition {
> * @regs: Parsed register blocks
> * @cxl_dvsec: Offset to the PCIe device DVSEC
> * @rcd: operating in RCD mode (CXL 3.0 9.11.8 CXL Devices Attached to an RCH)
> + * @bi: device is BI (Back-Invalidate) enabled
> * @media_ready: Indicate whether the device media is usable
> * @dpa_res: Overall DPA resource tree for the device
> * @part: DPA partition array
> @@ -181,6 +185,7 @@ struct cxl_dev_state {
> struct cxl_device_regs regs;
> int cxl_dvsec;
> bool rcd;
> + bool bi;
> bool media_ready;
> struct resource dpa_res;
> struct cxl_dpa_partition part[CXL_NR_PARTITIONS_MAX];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 20:27 [PATCH 0/6] cxl: Support Back-Invalidate Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] cxl: Add Back-Invalidate register definitions and structures Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-19 16:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-20 14:57 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-03-23 22:11 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] cxl: Add BI register probing and port initialization Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-20 15:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-20 16:19 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-03-23 23:10 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] cxl/pci: Add Back-Invalidate topology enable/disable Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-20 16:20 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-03-20 20:52 ` Alison Schofield
2026-03-20 16:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] cxl/pci: Add Back-Invalidate topology enable/disabl Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-24 0:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] cxl/pci: Add Back-Invalidate topology enable/disable Dave Jiang
2026-03-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] cxl: Wire BI setup and dealloc into device lifecycle Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-20 16:20 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-03-20 16:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] cxl/hdm: Add BI coherency support for endpoint decoders Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-20 16:20 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-03-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] cxl: Add HDM-DB region creation and sysfs interface Davidlohr Bueso
2026-03-20 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260320145749.0000656c@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=anisa.su@samsung.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox