Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Groves" <john@jagalactic.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/9] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:04:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611180451.8130B1F00ACA@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100019eb7bde24e-442d75b0-0dcc-416d-8f89-040ce73b183f-000000@email.amazonses.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unpatched dangling pointer in device.c leading to permanent probe failure and potential UAF
- [High] Concurrent sysfs mapping_store() execution causes TOCTOU heap buffer overflow and Use-After-Free in probe pathways
--

commit f0cb55dd27105cfc1116641d11d0187ba63297c0
Author: John Groves <John@Groves.net>

dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure

This patch factors out pgmap acquisition into fsdev_acquire_pgmap() and
defers the dev_dax->pgmap assignment until the probe can no longer fail.
This ensures a failed probe does not leave a dangling pointer.

> diff --git a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> index 52f46b3e245ea..cc097167ad2c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> @@ -219,47 +219,62 @@ static const struct file_operations fsdev_fops = {
>  	.release = fsdev_release,
>  };
>  
> -static int fsdev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> +/*
> + * Acquire the dev_pagemap for probe: the static (pre-populated) one if
> + * present, or a devm-allocated one for the dynamic case. Note that
> + * dev_dax->pgmap is not set here; fsdev_dax_probe() sets it only once
> + * probe succeeds, so a failed probe never leaves a dangling pointer
> + * to a devres-freed pgmap.
> + */
> +static struct dev_pagemap *fsdev_acquire_pgmap(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {

[ ... ]

> +	if (dev_dax->pgmap) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "dynamic-dax with pre-populated page map\n");
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}
>  
> -		pgmap_size = struct_size(pgmap, ranges, dev_dax->nr_range - 1);
> -		pgmap = devm_kzalloc(dev, pgmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!pgmap)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +	pgmap_size = struct_size(pgmap, ranges, dev_dax->nr_range - 1);
> +	pgmap = devm_kzalloc(dev, pgmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pgmap)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this allocation race with a concurrent
sysfs mapping_store() execution?

Since mapping_store() in drivers/dax/bus.c dynamically adds memory ranges
without checking if dev->driver is bound, it can run concurrently while the
driver is probing.

If dev_dax->nr_range increments after pgmap_size is calculated but before
the loop below executes, couldn't this cause a heap buffer overflow when
writing to pgmap->ranges[i]?

> -		pgmap->nr_range = dev_dax->nr_range;
> -		dev_dax->pgmap = pgmap;
> +	pgmap->nr_range = dev_dax->nr_range;
> +	for (int i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++)
> +		pgmap->ranges[i] = dev_dax->ranges[i].range;
>  
> -		for (i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++) {
> -			struct range *range = &dev_dax->ranges[i].range;
> +	return pgmap;
> +}
>  
> -			pgmap->ranges[i] = *range;
> -		}
> -	}
> +static int fsdev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> +{
> +	struct dax_device *dax_dev = dev_dax->dax_dev;
> +	struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> +	struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	u64 data_offset = 0;
> +	struct cdev *cdev;
> +	void *addr;
> +	int rc, i;
> +
> +	pgmap = fsdev_acquire_pgmap(dev_dax);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since you are fixing the
dangling dev_dax->pgmap pointer vulnerability here in fsdev_dax_probe(),
should the exact same fix be applied to dev_dax_probe() in drivers/dax/device.c?

It appears device.c still assigns dev_dax->pgmap immediately after
devm_kzalloc(), which would leave it dangling if a subsequent operation like
devm_request_mem_region() fails, causing subsequent probe attempts to
permanently fail.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/0100019eb7bcda4b-3f8edae9-d7a4-4bfa-aaea-fcef77fdbbc3-000000@email.amazonses.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260611173057.65868-1-john@jagalactic.com>
2026-06-11 17:31 ` [PATCH V5 0/9] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series John Groves
2026-06-11 17:31   ` [PATCH V5 1/9] dax: fix misleading comment about share/index union in dax_folio_reset_order() John Groves
2026-06-11 17:31   ` [PATCH V5 2/9] dax/fsdev: fix multi-range offset in memory_failure handler John Groves
2026-06-11 17:51     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  3:08     ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-15 13:13       ` John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32   ` [PATCH V5 3/9] dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap John Groves
2026-06-11 17:55     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  2:56     ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-15 13:16       ` John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32   ` [PATCH V5 4/9] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure John Groves
2026-06-11 18:04     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11 17:32   ` [PATCH V5 5/9] dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32   ` [PATCH V5 6/9] dax/fsdev: fail probe on invalid pgmap offset John Groves
2026-06-11 18:09     ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-06-15 13:23       ` John Groves
2026-06-11 18:13     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 17:32   ` [PATCH V5 7/9] dax: read holder_ops once in dax_holder_notify_failure() John Groves
2026-06-11 18:13     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  3:02     ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-15 13:22       ` John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32   ` [PATCH V5 8/9] dax: fix holder_ops race in fs_put_dax() John Groves
2026-06-11 18:28     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 17:33   ` [PATCH V5 9/9] dax: fsdev.c minor formatting cleanup John Groves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611180451.8130B1F00ACA@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=john@jagalactic.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox