From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Groves" <john@jagalactic.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/9] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:04:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611180451.8130B1F00ACA@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100019eb7bde24e-442d75b0-0dcc-416d-8f89-040ce73b183f-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unpatched dangling pointer in device.c leading to permanent probe failure and potential UAF
- [High] Concurrent sysfs mapping_store() execution causes TOCTOU heap buffer overflow and Use-After-Free in probe pathways
--
commit f0cb55dd27105cfc1116641d11d0187ba63297c0
Author: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure
This patch factors out pgmap acquisition into fsdev_acquire_pgmap() and
defers the dev_dax->pgmap assignment until the probe can no longer fail.
This ensures a failed probe does not leave a dangling pointer.
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> index 52f46b3e245ea..cc097167ad2c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> @@ -219,47 +219,62 @@ static const struct file_operations fsdev_fops = {
> .release = fsdev_release,
> };
>
> -static int fsdev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> +/*
> + * Acquire the dev_pagemap for probe: the static (pre-populated) one if
> + * present, or a devm-allocated one for the dynamic case. Note that
> + * dev_dax->pgmap is not set here; fsdev_dax_probe() sets it only once
> + * probe succeeds, so a failed probe never leaves a dangling pointer
> + * to a devres-freed pgmap.
> + */
> +static struct dev_pagemap *fsdev_acquire_pgmap(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> {
[ ... ]
> + if (dev_dax->pgmap) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "dynamic-dax with pre-populated page map\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
>
> - pgmap_size = struct_size(pgmap, ranges, dev_dax->nr_range - 1);
> - pgmap = devm_kzalloc(dev, pgmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pgmap)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + pgmap_size = struct_size(pgmap, ranges, dev_dax->nr_range - 1);
> + pgmap = devm_kzalloc(dev, pgmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pgmap)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this allocation race with a concurrent
sysfs mapping_store() execution?
Since mapping_store() in drivers/dax/bus.c dynamically adds memory ranges
without checking if dev->driver is bound, it can run concurrently while the
driver is probing.
If dev_dax->nr_range increments after pgmap_size is calculated but before
the loop below executes, couldn't this cause a heap buffer overflow when
writing to pgmap->ranges[i]?
> - pgmap->nr_range = dev_dax->nr_range;
> - dev_dax->pgmap = pgmap;
> + pgmap->nr_range = dev_dax->nr_range;
> + for (int i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++)
> + pgmap->ranges[i] = dev_dax->ranges[i].range;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++) {
> - struct range *range = &dev_dax->ranges[i].range;
> + return pgmap;
> +}
>
> - pgmap->ranges[i] = *range;
> - }
> - }
> +static int fsdev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> +{
> + struct dax_device *dax_dev = dev_dax->dax_dev;
> + struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> + struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
> + struct inode *inode;
> + u64 data_offset = 0;
> + struct cdev *cdev;
> + void *addr;
> + int rc, i;
> +
> + pgmap = fsdev_acquire_pgmap(dev_dax);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since you are fixing the
dangling dev_dax->pgmap pointer vulnerability here in fsdev_dax_probe(),
should the exact same fix be applied to dev_dax_probe() in drivers/dax/device.c?
It appears device.c still assigns dev_dax->pgmap immediately after
devm_kzalloc(), which would leave it dangling if a subsequent operation like
devm_request_mem_region() fails, causing subsequent probe attempts to
permanently fail.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/0100019eb7bcda4b-3f8edae9-d7a4-4bfa-aaea-fcef77fdbbc3-000000@email.amazonses.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260611173057.65868-1-john@jagalactic.com>
2026-06-11 17:31 ` [PATCH V5 0/9] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series John Groves
2026-06-11 17:31 ` [PATCH V5 1/9] dax: fix misleading comment about share/index union in dax_folio_reset_order() John Groves
2026-06-11 17:31 ` [PATCH V5 2/9] dax/fsdev: fix multi-range offset in memory_failure handler John Groves
2026-06-11 17:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 3:08 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-15 13:13 ` John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32 ` [PATCH V5 3/9] dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap John Groves
2026-06-11 17:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 2:56 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-15 13:16 ` John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32 ` [PATCH V5 4/9] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure John Groves
2026-06-11 18:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11 17:32 ` [PATCH V5 5/9] dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32 ` [PATCH V5 6/9] dax/fsdev: fail probe on invalid pgmap offset John Groves
2026-06-11 18:09 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-06-15 13:23 ` John Groves
2026-06-11 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 17:32 ` [PATCH V5 7/9] dax: read holder_ops once in dax_holder_notify_failure() John Groves
2026-06-11 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 3:02 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-15 13:22 ` John Groves
2026-06-11 17:32 ` [PATCH V5 8/9] dax: fix holder_ops race in fs_put_dax() John Groves
2026-06-11 18:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 17:33 ` [PATCH V5 9/9] dax: fsdev.c minor formatting cleanup John Groves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611180451.8130B1F00ACA@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=john@jagalactic.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox