From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gregory Price" <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] dax/kmem: add sysfs interface for atomic whole-device hotplug
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 15:11:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624151122.AFE551F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624145744.3532049-9-gourry@gourry.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The protection against deadlocks during driver unbind can be completely bypassed if the underlying memory blocks are manually onlined via the core memory sysfs, causing state desynchronization.
- [Medium] any_hotremove_failed is irrevocably set on recoverable sysfs hotremove failures, leading to a permanent leak of kmem_name.
--
commit fa89899811083ada324ea3db8204b1c135005af5
Author: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Subject: dax/kmem: add sysfs interface for atomic whole-device hotplug
This patch adds a new 'state' sysfs attribute for dax_kmem devices to enable
atomic whole-device hotplug operations. It also updates the unbind logic to
prevent deadlocks by omitting memory removal if the memory blocks are
currently online.
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> index a45e50def5371..340486586d82c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
[ ... ]
> +static int dax_kmem_do_hotremove(struct dev_dax *dev_dax,
> + struct dax_kmem_data *data)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + rc = offline_and_remove_memory_ranges(ranges, nr_ranges);
> + kfree(ranges);
> + if (rc) {
> + any_hotremove_failed = true;
> + dev_err(dev, "hotremove failed, device left online: %d\n", rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Does this permanently leak kmem_name on recoverable sysfs failures?
If a user attempts to unplug a device via sysfs and the hotremove fails
transiently (e.g., due to memory being in use), any_hotremove_failed is set
to true. Even if the user retries and the unplug later succeeds, this global
flag is never cleared, which will prevent freeing kmem_name during module
unload.
[ ... ]
> @@ -348,20 +490,26 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> static void dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> {
[ ... ]
> + if (dax_kmem_state_is_online(data->state)) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "Hotplug regions stuck online until reboot\n");
> + any_hotremove_failed = true;
> + return;
> + } else if (data->state == MMOP_OFFLINE &&
> + dax_kmem_do_hotremove(dev_dax, data)) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "Unplug failed, resources leaked until reboot\n");
> return;
> }
[Severity: High]
Can this deadlock during unbind if the memory state is desynchronized?
If the device is configured with auto_online_blocks=offline, data->state is
initially MMOP_OFFLINE. If a user manually onlines the underlying memory
blocks via the generic /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/state sysfs
interface, data->state remains MMOP_OFFLINE.
During unbind, dev_dax_kmem_remove() will evaluate
dax_kmem_state_is_online(data->state) as false and proceed to call
dax_kmem_do_hotremove() instead of safely aborting. This attempts to offline
the blocks while holding the device unbind lock, bypassing the intended
deadlock protection.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260624145744.3532049-1-gourry@gourry.net?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 14:57 [PATCH v5 0/9] dax/kmem: atomic whole-device hotplug via sysfs Gregory Price
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] mm/memory: add memory_block_aligned_range() helper Gregory Price
2026-06-24 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] mm/memory_hotplug: pass online_type to online_memory_block() via arg Gregory Price
2026-06-24 16:28 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] mm/memory_hotplug: export mhp_get_default_online_type Gregory Price
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] mm/memory_hotplug: add __add_memory_driver_managed() with online_type arg Gregory Price
2026-06-24 16:41 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] mm/memory_hotplug: offline_and_remove_memory_ranges() Gregory Price
2026-06-24 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] dax: plumb hotplug online_type through dax Gregory Price
2026-06-24 15:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] dax/kmem: extract hotplug/hotremove helper functions Gregory Price
2026-06-24 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] dax/kmem: add sysfs interface for atomic whole-device hotplug Gregory Price
2026-06-24 15:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] selftests/dax: add dax/kmem hotplug sysfs regression test Gregory Price
2026-06-24 15:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 18:59 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] dax/kmem: atomic whole-device hotplug via sysfs Gregory Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624151122.AFE551F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox