Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anisa Su" <anisa.su887@gmail.com>
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 21/31] cxl + dax: Surface dax_resources on DCD Add Capacity events
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 18:29:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625182950.55E951F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625112638.550691-22-anisa.su@samsung.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The dax_resource devm cleanup action is tied to the dc_extent device instead of the DAX region, leading to a Use-After-Free of the DAX region if the DAX driver unbinds.
--

commit 20b0e06e09f045b8ed2d61cce6004f2c3647ec5a
Author: Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>

cxl + dax: Surface dax_resources on DCD Add Capacity events

This commit defines the DAX region .notify callback and registers a
dax_resource for each extent when the CXL side onlines a tag group during
a DC Add event.

> diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c
> index 7356aaaffe577..9b5c03616b83d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/bus.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -182,6 +182,138 @@ static bool is_dynamic(struct dax_region *dax_region)
>  	return (dax_region->res.flags & IORESOURCE_DAX_DCD) != 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void __dax_release_resource(struct dax_resource *dax_resource)
> +{
> +	struct dax_region *dax_region = dax_resource->region;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&dax_region_rwsem);
> +	dev_dbg(dax_region->dev, "Extent release resource %pr\n",
> +		dax_resource->res);
[ ... ]
> +static int __dax_region_add_resource(struct dax_region *dax_region,
> +				     struct device *device,
> +				     resource_size_t start, resource_size_t length,
> +				     const uuid_t *tag, u16 seq_num)
> +{
> +	struct dax_resource *dax_resource __free(kfree) =
> +				kzalloc(sizeof(*dax_resource), GFP_KERNEL);
[ ... ]
> +	/*
> +	 * open code devm_add_action_or_reset() to avoid recursive write lock
> +	 * of dax_region_rwsem in the error case.
> +	 */
> +	rc = devm_add_action(device, dax_release_resource, dax_resource);

[Severity: High]
Does this tie the cleanup action to the wrong device lifetime?

In __dax_region_add_resource(), the devm_add_action() registers
dax_release_resource() to the passed-in device, which is the dc_extent
device managed by the CXL core.

However, the dax_region is tied to the DAX driver's lifecycle. If a user
unbinds the DAX driver, the dax_region is freed. Because the dc_extent
device is managed externally, it outlives the DAX driver unbind.

Later, when the CXL region is destroyed and the dc_extent is released,
dax_release_resource() will run and call __dax_release_resource(), which
dereferences the freed dax_region:

__dax_release_resource()
    struct dax_region *dax_region = dax_resource->region;
    dev_dbg(dax_region->dev, ...);

Can this lead to a use-after-free on the dax_region?

> +	if (rc) {
> +		__dax_release_resource(dax_resource);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(device, no_free_ptr(dax_resource));
> +	return 0;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260625112638.550691-1-anisa.su@samsung.com?part=21

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-25 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-25 11:04 DCD: Add support for Dynamic Capacity Devices (DCD) Anisa Su
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 01/31] cxl/mbox: Flag " Anisa Su
2026-06-26 21:43   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 02/31] cxl/mem: Read dynamic capacity configuration from the device Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 22:26   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 04/31] cxl/core: Enforce partition order/simplify partition calls Anisa Su
2026-06-26 22:37   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 05/31] cxl/mem: Expose dynamic ram 1 partition in sysfs Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 23:08   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 06/31] cxl/port: Add 'dynamic_ram_1' to endpoint decoder mode Anisa Su
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 07/31] cxl/region: Add DC DAX region support Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 23:18   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 08/31] cxl/events: Split event msgnum configuration from irq setup Anisa Su
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 09/31] cxl/pci: Factor out interrupt policy check Anisa Su
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 10/31] cxl/mem: Configure dynamic capacity interrupts Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 11/31] cxl/core: Return endpoint decoder information from region search Anisa Su
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 12/31] cxl/mem: Set up framework for handling DC Events Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 21:54   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 13/31] cxl/mem: Add 20 second timeout for stalled DC_ADD_CAPACITY chains Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 14/31] cxl/extent: Handle DC Add Capacity events Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 15/31] cxl/mem: Drop misaligned DCD extent groups Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 16/31] cxl/extent: Validate DC extent partition Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 17/31] cxl/mem: Enforce tag-group semantics Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 18/31] cxl/extent: Handle DC Release Capacity events Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 19/31] cxl/extent: Enforce cross-region tag uniqueness Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 20/31] cxl/region/extent: Expose dc_extent information in sysfs Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 21/31] cxl + dax: Surface dax_resources on DCD Add Capacity events Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:29   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-25 11:04 ` [PATCH v11 22/31] cxl + dax: Release dax_resources on DCD Release " Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 23/31] dax/bus: Factor out dev dax resize logic Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 24/31] dax/bus: Add uuid sysfs attribute to dax devices Anisa Su
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 25/31] dax/bus: Reject resize on DC dax devices and enforce 0-size creation Anisa Su
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 26/31] dax/bus: Tag-aware uuid claim and show on DC dax devices Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 27/31] cxl/region: Read existing extents on region creation Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 28/31] cxl/mem: Trace Dynamic capacity Event Record Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 29/31] tools/testing/cxl: Make event logs dynamic Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 30/31] tools/testing/cxl: Add DC Regions to mock mem data Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 11:05 ` [PATCH v11 31/31] Documentation/cxl: Document DCD extent handling and DC-backed DAX regions Anisa Su
2026-06-25 18:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 18:00 ` [PATCH v11 03/31] cxl/cdat: Gather DSMAS data for DCD partitions Anisa Su
2026-06-26 22:30   ` Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260625182950.55E951F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=anisa.su887@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox