From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Richard Cheng" <icheng@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] cxl/region: Don't leak tolerated RAM -EFAULT from unmapped poison scan
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 07:53:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708075345.7A5F61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708074228.43654-4-icheng@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unbounded infinite loop in cxl_mem_get_poison() if the device returns 0 records but leaves FLAG_MORE set.
- [Medium] cxl_get_poison_by_memdev() does not abort on failure, silently overwriting earlier errors if subsequent partitions succeed.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 3/5] cxl/region: Don't leak tolerated RAM -EFAULT from unmapped poison scan ---
commit 9b48fd52ca70c063c7f4e5fc8516877eba1fee39
Author: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
cxl/region: Don't leak tolerated RAM -EFAULT from unmapped poison scan
cxl_get_poison_unmapped() tolerates the -EFAULT a RAM partition returns
for Get Poison List by skipping that partition, but left rc holding the
error. Reset rc to 0 when tolerating the fault, matching poison_by_decoder().
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index be246fb09c999..52ba8e9e42885 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -2933,8 +2933,10 @@ static int cxl_get_poison_unmapped(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> if (!length)
> continue;
> rc = cxl_mem_get_poison(cxlmd, offset, length, NULL);
> - if (rc == -EFAULT && cxlds->part[i].mode == CXL_PARTMODE_RAM)
> + if (rc == -EFAULT && cxlds->part[i].mode == CXL_PARTMODE_RAM) {
> + rc = 0;
> continue;
> + }
> if (rc)
> break;
> }
While reviewing this change, I noticed a couple of related pre-existing
issues in other poison handling functions:
drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c:cxl_get_poison_by_memdev()
> rc = cxl_mem_get_poison(cxlmd, offset, length, NULL);
> /*
> * Invalid Physical Address is not an error for
> * volatile addresses. Device support is optional.
> */
> if (rc == -EFAULT && cxlds->part[i].mode == CXL_PARTMODE_RAM)
> rc = 0;
> }
> return rc;
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does cxl_get_poison_by_memdev() overwrite
previous error codes?
If an early partition fails (for example, returning -EIO) but a subsequent
partition succeeds, the loop lacks an if (rc) break; check. The rc variable
is overwritten with 0, masking the earlier failure from userspace.
drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c:cxl_mem_get_poison()
> nr_records = nr_records + le16_to_cpu(po->count);
> if (nr_records >= mds->poison.max_errors) {
> dev_dbg(&cxlmd->dev, "Max Error Records reached: %d\n",
> nr_records);
> break;
> }
> } while (po->flags & CXL_POISON_FLAG_MORE);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this loop in cxl_mem_get_poison()
spin infinitely?
If a hardware device returns a payload with po->count == 0 and the
CXL_POISON_FLAG_MORE flag set, nr_records won't increment. The safety bound
nr_records >= mds->poison.max_errors is never reached, which could cause a
kernel hang while holding mds->poison.mutex.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708074228.43654-1-icheng@nvidia.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 7:42 [PATCH v3 0/5] cxl: Sashiko bug fixes Richard Cheng
2026-07-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] cxl/features: Reject feature offset that overflows 16-bit field Richard Cheng
2026-07-08 7:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] cxl/region: Scan all partitions for unmapped poison Richard Cheng
2026-07-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] cxl/region: Don't leak tolerated RAM -EFAULT from unmapped poison scan Richard Cheng
2026-07-08 7:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] cxl/region: Start unmapped poison scan at the committed decoder boundary Richard Cheng
2026-07-08 7:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] cxl/memdev: Don't overwrite the error from an earlier partition poison query Richard Cheng
2026-07-08 7:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708075345.7A5F61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox