Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/9] PCI: of: Clear fwnode->dev during root bridge node removal
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 10:34:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708103435.2E2421F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708100302.517792-8-herve.codina@bootlin.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing fw_devlink cleanup in the error path of of_pci_make_host_bridge_node(), leaving a dangling fwnode->dev pointer.
- [High] Kernel panic on removal of overlay-provided PCI host bridge nodes due to unsafe changeset revert.
--

--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v9 7/9] PCI: of: Clear fwnode->dev during root bridge node removal ---
commit 9e6873c21d6442ce4222fe6e9ac417348c8b3fbd
Author: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>

PCI: of: Clear fwnode->dev during root bridge node removal

This commit clears fwnode->dev during of_pci_remove_host_bridge_node() to
prevent a dangling pointer. It ensures fw_devlink_set_device() is called
with a NULL device before the fwnode is cleared.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index ee9eb384b377a..8dd558a490bbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ void of_pci_remove_host_bridge_node(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>  	if (!np || !of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC))
>  		return;
>  
> +	fw_devlink_set_device(&np->fwnode, NULL);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does of_pci_make_host_bridge_node()
also need to clear the fwnode->dev pointer on its error path?

If device_add_of_node() fails in of_pci_make_host_bridge_node(), it jumps
to the error paths but leaves np->fwnode.dev pointing to the bridge device:

drivers/pci/of.c:of_pci_make_host_bridge_node() {
	...
	fw_devlink_set_device(&np->fwnode, &bridge->dev);
	...
	/* Add the of_node to host bridge and the root bus */
	ret = device_add_of_node(&bridge->dev, np);
	if (ret)
		goto out_revert_cset;

	ret = device_add_of_node(&bridge->bus->dev, np);
	if (ret)
		goto out_remove_bridge_dev_of_node;
	...
out_remove_bridge_dev_of_node:
	device_remove_of_node(&bridge->dev);
out_revert_cset:
	np->data = NULL;
	of_changeset_revert(cset);
out_free_node:
	of_node_put(np);
	...
}

If a concurrent thread acquired a reference to np, could the node outlive
the error path and result in a use-after-free where fwnode->dev points to
freed memory?

>  	device_remove_of_node(&bridge->bus->dev);
>  	device_remove_of_node(&bridge->dev);
>  	of_changeset_revert(np->data);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does calling
of_changeset_revert(np->data) unconditionally cause a crash when removing
an overlay-provided PCI host bridge node?

When an overlay provides the device tree node for a PCI host bridge, the
node inherently has the OF_DYNAMIC flag set. If the bridge is removed,
of_pci_remove_host_bridge_node() assumes the node was created by
of_pci_make_host_bridge_node() and executes of_changeset_revert(np->data).

Since np->data is NULL for standard overlay nodes, does this result in a
NULL pointer dereference in __of_changeset_revert_entries() when it tries
to evaluate &ocs->entries?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708100302.517792-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 10:02 [PATCH v9 0/9] lan966x pci device: Add support for SFPs, PCI part Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] driver core: fw_devlink: Introduce fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] drivers: core: Use fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] pinctrl: cs42l43: " Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] cxl/test: Use device_set_node() Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] cxl/test: Use fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] PCI: of: " Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] PCI: of: Clear fwnode->dev during root bridge node removal Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:34   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] PCI: of: Set fwnode device of newly created PCI device nodes Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:02 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] PCI: of: Remove fwnode_dev_initialized() call for a PCI root bridge node Herve Codina
2026-07-08 10:48   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708103435.2E2421F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox