Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Use spin_lock_irqsave() for CXL CPER work locks
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 16:46:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709164605.0147A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709162807.1957783-2-dave.jiang@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing bounds check on CPER record length and `dvsec_len` allows an out-of-bounds memory read that can be leaked to userspace via trace events.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Use spin_lock_irqsave() for CXL CPER work locks ---
commit 92925c77a9085c947d2733f2a851c54ec53288f8
Author: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>

ACPI: APEI: GHES: Use spin_lock_irqsave() for CXL CPER work locks

This patch switches the cxl_cper_work_lock and cxl_cper_prot_err_work_lock
from plain spinlocks to spin_lock_irqsave(). This prevents a potential deadlock
when a GHES error interrupt interrupts a thread holding the lock in process
context.

Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617-topics-ahmtib01-ras_ffh_arm_internal_review-v6-0-91f725174aa0@arm.com?part=6

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 3236a3ce79d6b..9b6917698ed24 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ int cxl_cper_unregister_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	if (cxl_cper_work != work)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	guard(spinlock)(&cxl_cper_work_lock);
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&cxl_cper_work_lock);
>  	cxl_cper_work = NULL;
>  	return 0;
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at the CXL CPER work queue
handling, is there a potential out-of-bounds read when processing
malformed CPER records?

In drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_helpers.c:cxl_cper_setup_prot_err_work_data(),
the cap_start pointer is computed using an untrusted dvsec_len from the
firmware:

    dvsec_start = (u8 *)(prot_err + 1);
    cap_start = dvsec_start + prot_err->dvsec_len;

    memcpy(&wd->ras_cap, cap_start, sizeof(wd->ras_cap));

Since dvsec_len is provided by firmware, could a maliciously large value
cause cap_start to point outside the mapped CPER record bounds?

Similarly, in drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:cxl_cper_post_event(), the code
copies the event record:

    memcpy(&wd.rec, rec, sizeof(wd.rec));

If a hardware device provides a malformed record with a small
error_data_length or an unusually large dvsec_len, could this unconditional
memcpy() read unmapped memory or leak kernel memory contents to userspace
via the kfifo trace events?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709162807.1957783-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 16:28 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Dave Jiang
2026-07-09 16:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Use spin_lock_irqsave() for CXL CPER work locks Dave Jiang
2026-07-09 16:46   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-10 17:27   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-07-09 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound CXL event record copy to the firmware section length Dave Jiang
2026-07-09 16:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: extlog: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER guard typo Dave Jiang
2026-07-09 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 17:27   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-07-09 16:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate CXL protocol error section length before RAS cap copy Dave Jiang
2026-07-10 17:27   ` Cheatham, Benjamin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709164605.0147A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox