From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Terry Bowman" <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 10/13] cxl: Add port and dport identifiers to CXL AER trace events
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 22:53:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717225316.02D321F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717222706.3540281-11-terry.bowman@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Asynchronous CPER error handling races with ACPI driver unbind, causing Use-After-Free of cxl_dport.
- [High] Live PCI configuration space reads on a potentially frozen or dead link during AER recovery.
--
--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v18 10/13] cxl: Add port and dport identifiers to CXL AER trace events ---
commit 069c60a58d08507582ec548c08666c5374faa22d
Author: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
Subject: cxl: Add port and dport identifiers to CXL AER trace events
This commit updates the CXL AER trace events to include port and dport
identifiers instead of deriving a plain device pointer at the caller. It
replaces the separate uncorrectable and correctable trace events with
unified cxl_aer_* events. CPER handling is also reworked to use
find_cxl_port_by_dev() and the unified trace helpers.
> The serial number is retrieved via pci_get_dsn() which performs live
> PCI configuration space reads. A following patch ("PCI: Cache PCI
> DSN into pci_dev->dsn during probe") replaces these with a cached
> serial number to avoid config space access in error handlers and panic
> paths.
[Severity: High]
Does calling pci_get_dsn() before the follow-up patch is applied risk
causing a lockup?
cxl_pci_error_detected() is called during AER recovery, where the link may
be in the pci_channel_io_frozen state. pci_get_dsn() executes live
configuration reads (pci_read_config_dword()) to traverse PCIe extended
capabilities.
Accessing a frozen link can cause the host bridge to lock up or trigger a
secondary master abort. Will this cause completion timeouts and prevent
recovery during the window between this patch and the subsequent caching
patch?
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> index d5dc2c22565da..acf40b2396c3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -109,47 +77,34 @@ static struct cxl_port *find_cxl_port_by_dev(struct device *dev, struct cxl_dpor
>
> void cxl_cper_handle_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data *data)
> {
[ ... ]
> + guard(device)(&port->dev);
> +
> + /* dport is NULL for Endpoint and Upstream Port devices */
> + dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(port, &pdev->dev);
[Severity: High]
Is it possible for the dport to be freed concurrently here, leading to a
use-after-free regression?
While cxl_cper_handle_prot_err() holds the port's device lock, cxl_dport
structures for root ports are tied to the parent ACPI device's devres
lifecycle.
If the parent driver unbinds (e.g., during ACPI hot-remove), it executes
devres_release_all() under the parent's lock, which frees the dport
directly via cxl_dport_remove() and free_dport().
Could cxl_find_dport_by_dev() load this freed pointer, which is then
dereferenced in the trace event?
drivers/cxl/core/trace.c:cxl_trace_dport_name() {
if (dport)
return dev_name(dport->dport_dev);
...
}
> - cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(mem_dev);
> if (data->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
> - cxl_cper_trace_corr_prot_err(cxlmd, data->ras_cap);
> + cxl_cper_trace_corr_prot_err(port, dport, pci_get_dsn(pdev),
> + &data->ras_cap);
> else
> - cxl_cper_trace_uncorr_prot_err(cxlmd, data->ras_cap);
> + cxl_cper_trace_uncorr_prot_err(port, dport, pci_get_dsn(pdev),
> + &data->ras_cap);
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -360,7 +306,8 @@ pci_ers_result_t cxl_pci_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> * cases below handle AER recovery for devices without active
> * CXL.mem traffic.
> */
> - ue = cxl_handle_ras(port, NULL, to_ras_base(port, NULL));
> + ue = cxl_handle_ras(port, NULL, to_ras_base(port, NULL),
> + pci_get_dsn(pdev));
> }
[Severity: High]
Does this live config read trigger the lockups mentioned in the commit
message? Since cxl_pci_error_detected() executes when the link state is
potentially pci_channel_io_frozen, the pci_get_dsn() call will traverse
PCIe extended capabilities on a dead link.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717222706.3540281-1-terry.bowman@amd.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 22:26 [PATCH v18 00/13] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v18 01/13] cxl/ras: Fix cxl_rch_get_aer_severity() wrong severity register Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v18 02/13] acpi/apei/ghes: Use raw_spinlock_t for CXL CPER work locks Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v18 03/13] cxl: Tighten CPER kfifo registration API and symbol visibility Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v18 04/13] cxl: Rename find_cxl_port() to find_cxl_port_by_dport() Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v18 05/13] PCI/AER: Introduce AER-CXL protocol error kfifo Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v18 06/13] PCI: Establish common CXL Port protocol error flow Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v18 07/13] PCI/CXL: Add RCH support to CXL handlers Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v18 08/13] cxl/pci: Thread port and dport through RAS handling helpers Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v18 09/13] cxl: Update CXL Endpoint AER handler Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v18 10/13] cxl: Add port and dport identifiers to CXL AER trace events Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v18 11/13] PCI: Cache PCI DSN into pci_dev->dsn during probe Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 7:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-07-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v18 12/13] PCI/CXL: Mask/Unmask CXL protocol errors Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v18 13/13] Documentation: cxl: Document CXL protocol error handling Terry Bowman
2026-07-17 22:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717225316.02D321F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox