Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anisa Su" <anisa.su887@gmail.com>
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/8] cxl/core: Return endpoint decoder information from region search
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 09:01:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731090122.1E07D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731084901.1512819-8-anisa.su@samsung.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `cxled` out-parameter is left uninitialized on early return paths in `cxl_dpa_to_region` and its inline stub, creating a vulnerability for uninitialized variable usage.
--

--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v12 7/8] cxl/core: Return endpoint decoder information from region search ---
commit c2b37a56d99a44aee4d4340c7154d9180c620839
Author: Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>

cxl/core: Return endpoint decoder information from region search

This commit updates cxl_dpa_to_region() to return the endpoint decoder
found during the region search via a new out-parameter. This information
is needed for dynamic capacity extent processing to calculate HPA offsets.

> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> index 07555ae638594..e4bd220faa92c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -61,7 +62,8 @@ static inline u64 cxl_dpa_to_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  	return ULLONG_MAX;
>  }
>  static inline
> -struct cxl_region *cxl_dpa_to_region(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa)
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_dpa_to_region(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa,
> +				     struct cxl_endpoint_decoder **cxled)
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }

[Severity: Medium]
If a future caller passes an uninitialized pointer variable for cxled, will
this static inline stub leave it uninitialized?

Could we set "*cxled = NULL" here when cxled is provided, to prevent callers
from evaluating stack garbage on return?

> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 1e211542b6b64..ec5e5b7090cf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3045,11 +3046,13 @@ static int __cxl_dpa_to_region(struct device *dev, void *arg)
>  			dev_name(dev));
>  
>  	ctx->cxlr = cxlr;
> +	ctx->cxled = cxled;
>  
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -struct cxl_region *cxl_dpa_to_region(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa)
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_dpa_to_region(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa,
> +				     struct cxl_endpoint_decoder **cxled)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_dpa_to_region_context ctx;
>  	struct cxl_port *port = cxlmd->endpoint;

[Severity: Medium]
Similar to the inline stub above, cxl_dpa_to_region() has an early return
path right after these variable declarations:

    if (!cxlmd->dev.driver)
        return NULL;

If a caller doesn't pre-initialize their cxled variable and hits this early
return, won't cxled remain uninitialized?

While current callers in this patch pass NULL, a future caller expecting
cxled to be populated might evaluate uninitialized stack memory. Should this
early return also initialize *cxled to NULL if cxled is provided?

> @@ -3063,6 +3066,9 @@ struct cxl_region *cxl_dpa_to_region(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa)
>  	if (cxl_num_decoders_committed(port))
>  		device_for_each_child(&port->dev, &ctx, __cxl_dpa_to_region);
>  
> +	if (cxled)
> +		*cxled = ctx.cxled;
> +
>  	return ctx.cxlr;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731084901.1512819-1-anisa.su@samsung.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31  8:48 [PATCH v12 0/8] DCD Prep Series Anisa Su
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] cxl/mbox: Flag support for Dynamic Capacity Devices (DCD) Anisa Su
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] cxl/mem: Read dynamic capacity configuration from the device Anisa Su
2026-07-31  9:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] cxl/cdat: Gather DSMAS data for DCD partitions Anisa Su
2026-07-31  9:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] cxl/events: Split event msgnum configuration from irq setup Anisa Su
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] cxl/pci: Factor out interrupt policy check Anisa Su
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] cxl/mem: Configure dynamic capacity interrupts Anisa Su
2026-07-31  9:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] cxl/core: Return endpoint decoder information from region search Anisa Su
2026-07-31  9:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-31  8:48 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] cxl/core: Enforce partition order/simplify partition calls Anisa Su

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731090122.1E07D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=anisa.su887@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox