Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Richard Cheng" <icheng@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] cxl/region: Reset software-created regions on memdev detach
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:03:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805080331.0424B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805074042.30173-2-icheng@nvidia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Userspace can bypass the F_LOCK protection intended to prevent userspace disposition, resulting in permanently leaked hardware decoders and potential memory corruption.
--

--- Patch [1]: [RFC PATCH 1/3] cxl/region: Reset software-created regions on memdev detach ---
commit f2541005d7a5430e1aac6ecade8931768b282855
Author: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>

cxl/region: Reset software-created regions on memdev detach

This patch modifies region teardown to pass a reset context (DEFAULT vs
MANAGED_DETACH). It allows a memdev attach provider to reset its own
software-created regions without changing generic teardown behavior.

> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 1e211542b6b64..7fcaddc61180d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -2893,7 +2963,7 @@ static ssize_t delete_region_store(struct device *dev,
>  	if (!cxlr || !sysfs_streq(buf, dev_name(&cxlr->dev)))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	unregister_region(cxlr);
> +	unregister_region(cxlr, CXL_REGION_RESET_DEFAULT);
>  
>  	return len;
>  }

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this sysfs path allow
userspace to bypass the F_LOCK protection and corrupt memory?

When a user writes to the delete_region sysfs file, delete_region_store()
unconditionally calls unregister_region() with CXL_REGION_RESET_DEFAULT,
even if CXL_REGION_F_LOCK is set.

This propagates down to cxl_region_decode_reset(), where the combination
of F_LOCK and CXL_REGION_RESET_DEFAULT causes an early return, skipping
the hardware reset:

drivers/cxl/core/region.c:cxl_region_decode_reset() {
        if (test_bit(CXL_REGION_F_LOCK, &cxlr->flags) &&
            (context != CXL_REGION_RESET_MANAGED_DETACH || ...))
                return;
        ...
}

However, the software teardown still completes in __cxl_decoder_detach()
and the region is unregistered, freeing the HPA range for reallocation:

drivers/cxl/core/region.c:__cxl_decoder_detach() {
        ...
        if (p->state == CXL_CONFIG_ACTIVE) {
                p->state = CXL_CONFIG_INTERLEAVE_ACTIVE;
                cxl_region_teardown_targets(cxlr);
        }
        p->targets[cxled->pos] = NULL;
        p->nr_targets--;
        ...
}

Could this leave the hardware decoders permanently programmed while the
software structures are destroyed? If the kernel reallocates this HPA range
to a new region, would it create overlapping hardware decoders and lead
to memory corruption?

The same bypass pattern appears to be preserved in store_targetN() when
detaching targets. Should these sysfs paths verify CXL_REGION_F_LOCK
before initiating teardown?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805074042.30173-1-icheng@nvidia.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05  7:40 [RFC PATCH 0/3] cxl: Auto-create a region for Type-2 memdev attach Richard Cheng
2026-08-05  7:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] cxl/region: Reset software-created regions on memdev detach Richard Cheng
2026-08-05  8:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05  7:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] cxl/region: Auto-create a region for memdev attach Richard Cheng
2026-08-05  8:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05  7:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] cxl/test: Exercise Type-2 automatic region creation Richard Cheng
2026-08-05  7:59   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260805080331.0424B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox