From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guixin Liu" <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cxl/cdat: Fix uninitialized stack use in bandwidth gathering
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:44:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812084459.07B941F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812083035.372308-2-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Zero-initializing `ep_coord` codifies a logic error where valid PCI bandwidth is discarded if CDAT bandwidth is unreported (0), contradicting subsystem conventions.
- [High] The cxl_port_perf_data_calculate() function declares an uninitialized access_coordinate array on the stack, which is leaked to userspace via sysfs for Restricted CXL Devices (RCDs).
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/2] cxl/cdat: Fix uninitialized stack use in bandwidth gathering ---
commit ecbce27f92f7e67349081889c3ca38eb48761104
Author: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: cxl/cdat: Fix uninitialized stack use in bandwidth gathering
This commit fixes uninitialized stack usage in cxl_endpoint_gather_bandwidth()
and cxl_switch_gather_bandwidth() by zero-initializing the access_coordinate
arrays. It prevents uninitialized kernel stack data from being exposed as
bandwidth and latency figures.
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> index 5c9f072625135..df9261ba84e5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> @@ -633,9 +633,9 @@ static int cxl_endpoint_gather_bandwidth(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> struct cxl_port *endpoint = to_cxl_port(cxled->cxld.dev.parent);
> struct cxl_port *parent_port = to_cxl_port(endpoint->dev.parent);
> struct cxl_port *gp_port = to_cxl_port(parent_port->dev.parent);
> - struct access_coordinate pci_coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX];
> - struct access_coordinate sw_coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX];
> - struct access_coordinate ep_coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX];
> + struct access_coordinate pci_coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX] = { };
> + struct access_coordinate sw_coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX] = { };
> + struct access_coordinate ep_coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX] = { };
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does zero-initializing
ep_coord codify a logic error where valid PCI bandwidth is discarded?
If an endpoint CDAT does not report bandwidth, the bandwidth fields in
perf->cdat_coord will be 0. When cxl_coordinates_combine() is called later
in cxl_endpoint_gather_bandwidth():
rc = cxl_pci_get_bandwidth(pdev, pci_coord);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
/*
* Min of upstream link bandwidth and Endpoint CDAT bandwidth from
* DSLBIS.
*/
cxl_coordinates_combine(ep_coord, pci_coord, perf->cdat_coord);
The __cxl_coordinates_combine() helper requires both inputs to be non-zero
to assign the output:
if (c1->write_bandwidth && c2->write_bandwidth)
out->write_bandwidth = min(c1->write_bandwidth,
c2->write_bandwidth);
Because the bandwidth in perf->cdat_coord is 0, ep_coord remains untouched
(which is now 0). This completely discards the valid upstream link
bandwidth in pci_coord, resulting in an erroneous region aggregate
bandwidth of 0.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while fixing uninitialized stack
variables, did you notice a similar leak in cxl_port_perf_data_calculate()
in drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c?
It declares an uninitialized array:
struct access_coordinate ep_c[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX];
...
rc = cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates(port, ep_c);
If the device is a Restricted CXL Device (RCD),
cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates() in drivers/cxl/core/port.c returns 0
early without initializing the array:
/*
* Skip calculation for RCD. Expectation is HMAT already covers RCD case
* since RCH does not support hotplug.
*/
if (cxlmd->cxlds->rcd)
return 0;
cxl_port_perf_data_calculate() then passes this uninitialized array to
cxl_coordinates_combine(), which can leak kernel stack memory to userspace
via world-readable sysfs region attributes.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812083035.372308-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 8:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] cxl: Fix uninitialized access coordinates Guixin Liu
2026-08-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cxl/cdat: Fix uninitialized stack use in bandwidth gathering Guixin Liu
2026-08-12 8:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 9:08 ` Guixin Liu
2026-08-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cxl/port: Fix uninitialized coordinates reported for RCDs Guixin Liu
2026-08-12 9:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] cxl: Fix uninitialized access coordinates Richard Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812084459.07B941F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox