From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guixin Liu" <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] cxl/cdat: Fix uninitialized stack use in bandwidth gathering
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:45:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831094517.EB7D91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831092216.540644-2-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Inconsistent handling of 0 (unreported) bandwidth in __cxl_coordinates_combine due to pointer aliasing causes mathematically incorrect bandwidth calculations.
--
commit 4a06d73ff1f865478d3669ce819144aacd32799a
Author: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
cxl/cdat: Fix uninitialized stack use in bandwidth gathering
The commit zeroes out access_coordinate arrays on the stack in
cxl_endpoint_gather_bandwidth() and cxl_switch_gather_bandwidth(). This
prevents uninitialized stack residues from being summed into the latency
members and stored in sysfs when the endpoint CDAT reports no bandwidth.
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> index 5c9f072625135..df9261ba84e5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static struct xarray *cxl_switch_gather_bandwidth(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> {
> struct xarray *res_xa __free(free_perf_xa) =
> kzalloc_obj(*res_xa);
> - struct access_coordinate coords[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX];
> + struct access_coordinate coords[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX] = { };
> struct cxl_perf_ctx *ctx, *us_ctx;
> unsigned long index, us_index;
> int dev_count = 0;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does pointer aliasing in
cxl_coordinates_combine() cause incorrect bandwidth calculations when an
endpoint reports 0 (unknown) bandwidth?
Looking at cxl_switch_gather_bandwidth(), if ctx->coord has 0 bandwidth,
does coords incorrectly retain the PCI link bandwidth instead of 0?
drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c:__cxl_coordinates_combine() {
...
if (c1->write_bandwidth && c2->write_bandwidth)
out->write_bandwidth = min(c1->write_bandwidth,
c2->write_bandwidth);
...
}
When called later in cxl_switch_gather_bandwidth(), coords aliases both
out and c1:
/* Retrieve the upstream link bandwidth */
rc = cxl_pci_get_bandwidth(to_pci_dev(dev), coords);
...
cxl_coordinates_combine(coords, coords, ctx->coord);
Because coords is populated by cxl_pci_get_bandwidth(), it is non-zero.
If ctx->coord (c2) has 0 bandwidth, the condition fails and coords (out)
is left unmodified.
Will this cause the endpoint's bandwidth to be incorrectly aggregated up
the tree as the full PCI link bandwidth instead of 0 when CDAT data is
missing?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831092216.540644-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 9:22 [PATCH v4 0/2] cxl: Fix uninitialized access coordinates Guixin Liu
2026-08-31 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] cxl/cdat: Fix uninitialized stack use in bandwidth gathering Guixin Liu
2026-08-31 9:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 16:01 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-31 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cxl/port: Fix uninitialized coordinates reported for RCDs Guixin Liu
2026-08-31 10:00 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831094517.EB7D91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox