From: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>, Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Shaikh Kamaluddin <shaikhkamal2012@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] cxl/memdev: Fix poison debugfs vs unbind deadlock
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 20:48:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831124809.889829-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
Writing a memdev poison debugfs file while cxl_mem is being unbound
deadlocks. Patch 2 fixes it by not waiting for the device lock in those
handlers. Patch 1 adds the trylock guard it uses.
Patch 2 does not build without patch 1, so the two need to travel
together.
Testing:
Reproduced on a QEMU CXL topology whose type3 devices advertise poison
inject support:
while :; do echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/cxl/mem0/inject_poison; done &
while :; do
echo mem0 > /sys/bus/cxl/drivers/cxl_mem/unbind
echo mem0 > /sys/bus/cxl/drivers/cxl_mem/bind
done
Without the fix the unbind wedges within seconds. The three tasks
involved, from /proc/<pid>/stack:
writer, state S, holds the debugfs reference and waits for the lock
cxl_debugfs_poison_inject+0x25/0xa0 [cxl_mem]
debugfs_attr_write+0x61/0xb0
full_proxy_write+0xfc/0x1c0
vfs_write+0x1d4/0xe60
unbind, state D, holds the lock and waits for the reference to drain
remove_one+0x27f/0x3d0
debugfs_remove+0x44/0x60
release_nodes+0xfa/0x2c0
devres_release_all+0x113/0x1a0
device_unbind_cleanup+0x76/0x260
device_release_driver_internal+0x3eb/0x540
unbind_store+0xde/0x100
cxl_port workqueue, state D, blocked on the same lock
device_release_driver_internal+0x96/0x540
detach_memdev+0x79/0xb0 [cxl_core]
process_one_work+0x6b0/0xfb0
The writer is in interruptible sleep and can be killed; the unbind
cannot, and because cxl_bus_wq is an ordered workqueue the wedged
detach_memdev() blocks every other CXL bus work item behind it.
With both patches applied, 46 unbind/bind cycles against the same writer
loop all completed, no task was left in D state, and the writer collected
10920 EBUSY returns from the contended trylock. Note that lockdep stays
quiet either way: one leg of the cycle is the debugfs active_users
completion rather than a lock it tracks.
v1 -> v2:
- add the device_trylock() guard and use ACQUIRE(device_try, ...) instead
of open-coding device_trylock()/device_unlock(), keeping the style the
Fixes: commit established (Shaikh Kamaluddin)
- cut the changelog down to the failing condition, the consequence and
the fix; the call graph and the reproducer live here instead
- say how the issue was found and how it was tested
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/\
20260826125248.4003792-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com/
Guixin Liu (2):
driver core: Add conditional guard support for device_trylock()
cxl/memdev: Fix deadlock between poison debugfs and cxl_mem unbind
drivers/cxl/mem.c | 14 ++++++++++----
include/linux/device.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
base-commit: 7098e9cd98a05c0c5de2fae0c2465f9d966fdd07
--
2.43.7
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 12:48 Guixin Liu [this message]
2026-08-31 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Add conditional guard support for device_trylock() Guixin Liu
2026-08-31 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl/memdev: Fix deadlock between poison debugfs and cxl_mem unbind Guixin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831124809.889829-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shaikhkamal2012@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox