From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84393328B7B; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 07:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788334773; cv=none; b=dBhEXtBSKn+yP9wcyDHEnio+ft6GEXMBG9srWWLnM2JNKjaDkCZyXulnLKJYYNhWUhnGSm0P8xzJSDAIfa8Idz2YfhyCTjzbVloM8JC5XajoD1t6AJyNQqkZMLZvSVkZhTk8gcfdqTU8vAB/Yhe+Ls818SGkz8P/WLNaFiAIT2Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788334773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T23Y/8MH4a976pJ1aTJSlZattyebK9SFXcC6KDIsuPg=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=X+S8+40YLWjEdzL8y5PyaLNf0fy/OaUext4/ZA2Xi8Kt+XxsHQrh7YkOZ8As4O8qtY+VQcHyo9rmHqvroKpPrZNCGdSgERh/YWoIOxQvryM5uCcyrsPyT0z5Kd473066R5XCueszjUvIWt9aDZHTAvsoMsRDPzQ01eUG3dWFNTU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bgYB/rWG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bgYB/rWG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 031E21F000E9; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 07:39:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788334772; bh=T23Y/8MH4a976pJ1aTJSlZattyebK9SFXcC6KDIsuPg=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=bgYB/rWG+ocw4puQ6R80RMhjr+us6cH0GThiryIkLBpiy21HRpJO5k5lkxdvLQH2V 21T4uiqQOaysBOnV8cmqVWmZoV/JGhULX4qtbOvtkzwV9K79ptGN0yUXk0l74+81X8 ScStKGyuLViChEo31Y1NoX7enjizSPeQ97Eho/PgQ7Kb3n+MKeqR+Ue049IO7PERHO AQw7aPt1JOLZkvfdpW2OvzL3kO3LWLjruYTBHGa1WGNsJSP3r0PUr0RW43jilTtp+2 Iv+lhaa3c87KKuVNlKqyMX1b1i9724mp2rZwiyw6cbB+2If3FwleeoC67wKb4fFIPi Ex5OG1jqSx+uA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/12] PCI/CXL: Reject CXL Reset on multifunction devices Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Srirangan Madhavan" Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260902072804.665639-9-smadhavan@nvidia.com> References: <20260902072804.665639-1-smadhavan@nvidia.com> <20260902072804.665639-9-smadhavan@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:39:31 +0000 Message-Id: <20260902073932.031E21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > CXL Reset can be exposed as a PCI function reset method only when the > reset is function-scoped. PCI reset-method probing runs during > enumeration, so walking sibling functions there can race with functions > that have not been added to the bus yet. >=20 > Reject multifunction devices for now instead of trying to infer reset > scope from sibling state. Systems that can prove a multifunction device > has function-scoped CXL Reset can be enabled later. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902072804.6656= 39-1-smadhavan@nvidia.com?part=3D8