Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shivank Garg" <shivankg@amd.com>
Cc: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Chuck Lever" <cel@kernel.org>,
	dsterba@suse.cz, "Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 05/11] mm/migrate: add a dedicated movable_ops migration pass
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 11:04:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902110412.BA5141F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-migrate-refactor-shivank-v1-5-9dcca87669c4@amd.com>

> Pages with movable_ops transfer ownership through a driver callback and do
> not need the unmap, TLB flush, copy, or LRU handling used for LRU folios.
> These pages are expected to stop being represented as folios. Separating
> their migration from the LRU folio path prepares for that conversion.
> 
> Add migrate_movable_ops_pages() before LRU folio migration to handle
> allocation, locking, retries, and cleanup on a separate list. Return
> remaining pages through @ret_folios and remove the now-unreachable
> movable_ops branches from the LRU path.
> 
> This changes three details of movable_ops migration:
>  - Pages are processed before LRU folios rather than in source-list order.
>  - Synchronous callers use the requested mode from the first attempt
>    instead of the LRU asynchronous pre-pass.
>  - A callback returning -EAGAIN ends the current attempt, so a later
>    retry allocates a fresh destination.
>  - MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT waits for the page lock instead of giving up,
>    because !uptodate check is not applicable for movable_ops
>    pages.
> 
> Suggested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902-migrate-refactor-shivank-v1-0-9dcca87669c4@amd.com?part=5


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 10:52 [PATCH RFC 00/11] mm/migrate: separate migration paths and carry migration policy Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] mm/migrate: extract folio unmap phase Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] mm/migrate: handle retries in migrate_folios_move() Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] mm/migrate: factor out folio splitting on allocation failure Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] mm/migrate: use a dedicated list for hugetlb folios Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] mm/migrate: add a dedicated movable_ops migration pass Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:04   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] mm/migrate: rename migrate_pages_batch() to migrate_folios_batch() Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] mm/migrate: add migrate_lru_folios() entry point Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] mm/migrate: move LRU batching into migrate_lru_folios() Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] mm/migrate: thread migration policy through a control struct Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 11:19   ` [sos-linux-ext-patches] " Garg, Shivank
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] mm/migrate: pass migrate_control to migrate_pages() Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:52 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] mm/migrate: pass migrate_control to migrate_folio() Shivank Garg
2026-09-02 11:10   ` Jan Kara
2026-09-02 11:10   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902110412.BA5141F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox