From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/13] efi/cper: Reject an error status block length that wraps a u32
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 17:38:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904173821.823D61F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904172337.1409775-3-dave.jiang@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Out-of-bounds read in CPER error status validation due to insufficient remaining length check
--
commit 397f02447210fe6eca20cec521b708fca415a921
Author: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
efi/cper: Reject an error status block length that wraps a u32
cper_estatus_len() sums the firmware-controlled data_length into a u32,
which can wrap to 0. This patch rejects a length that cannot be expressed in
a u32 in cper_estatus_check_header() to prevent callers from receiving a
short value.
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714231835.303081-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=1
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 332c78f2d5617..3dcef618ad39f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,17 @@ int cper_estatus_check_header(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
> estatus->raw_data_offset < sizeof(*estatus) + estatus->data_length)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /*
> + * cper_estatus_len() sums these into a u32, and a wrapped sum reads
> + * back smaller than the record. Reject a length that cannot be
> + * expressed so no caller is handed the short value.
> + */
> + if ((u64)sizeof(*estatus) + estatus->data_length > U32_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (estatus->raw_data_length &&
> + (u64)estatus->raw_data_offset + estatus->raw_data_length > U32_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cper_estatus_check_header);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while looking at validation
for estatus->data_length here, I noticed an out-of-bounds read issue in how
the sections are parsed by cper_estatus_check().
If firmware provides an estatus block where the data_length leaves between 1
and 63 bytes (smaller than sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data)) after a
valid section, the apei_estatus_for_each_section() loop will erroneously
enter another iteration due to its boundary condition:
include/acpi/ghes.h:apei_estatus_for_each_section()
for (section = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1); \
(void *)section - (void *)(estatus + 1) < estatus->data_length; \
section = acpi_hest_get_next(section))
The subsequent access to acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) and
gdata->error_data_length in cper_estatus_check() will then read past the
valid data_length.
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c:cper_estatus_check()
apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, gdata) {
int record_size;
if (check_add_overflow(acpi_hest_get_size(gdata),
gdata->error_data_length, &record_size))
return -EINVAL;
A heap out-of-bounds read here can cause a page fault in MCE or NMI context,
leading to a fatal machine check (kernel panic).
Could we tighten the apei_estatus_for_each_section loop boundary or add a
check in cper_estatus_check() to ensure the remaining data_length is at
least the size of a section header before allowing the next iteration?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904172337.1409775-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 17:23 [PATCH v6 00/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] efi/cper: Reject CPER records with an out-of-range error_data_length Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] efi/cper: Reject an error status block length that wraps a u32 Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate elog record length before walking sections Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] ACPI: extlog: Defer CXL protocol error handling to avoid lock inversion Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] ACPI: extlog: Avoid populating software AER metadata from raw hardware buffer Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate PCIe error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] ACPI: extlog: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER guard typo Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound CXL event record copy to the firmware section length Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate CXL protocol error section length before RAS cap copy Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] efi/cper: Read only validated fields in cper_mem_err_pack() Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound AER info copy and sanitize software metadata Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] cxl/ras: Make cxl_cper_handle_prot_err() static Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 00/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-04 19:44 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904173821.823D61F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox