From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E697E1397; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 08:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788941746; cv=none; b=Xz97RQjwP4P3BbZGO1ZBCWdEmS68sZLdM1nVOiMUesMXpRNlC/90qK71f6mqlpakKjytPDmWB3QFCqzsdB/N/4yLDlzBDz6vtLfKKnQPq4bPZ/9MGqYMQrahNIPGzhQVOnWCRANEdZGqW6cf/bX+SC0OwhPiNmrD3OQIKiMpMbI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788941746; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a1lhgt9CISj5Ul6rBE1QU6mQFvRhbKT8F3/qagXqNvI=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=J3ofdKV4lujIAXG908NY1lT7M0RSU9fs2am1ptcQ3Mm4WNsnkBzc+lHrkgCN+5Y5UjbTe5PTii9TiW3mMoB7wOJgDGXXhBORlMI1qCwtvO11jrkfwkOn6duo3oEXgPPNFzeKyRWbD/3e2qQF0cfjYOpHx9UtI/Zw5J5c4LSz73E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=KvZ5CODe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KvZ5CODe" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E8E31F00A3D; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 08:15:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788941744; bh=xPvH5rJOmjE4p401wK4Cw3yq/Drn/8Elzs7NVYwlfC4=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=KvZ5CODe8JS8Lm6J0CyQ23mzAElSw2KMfTADWMdCEsAIUvV2r+fwYEdhMvystWGx1 0uBnUwgDlHd6aymNk0QhDm7dauyARm3sf8N/8/wiO0A72kkMeeSeqwnFpC2axYAFJ9 EqH9PJd13MvyT3evTi+KOLp9vV9YWLTzHVU/TlAqqIFJPnCfS7tn3wVHFyWgEAD+v2 P98023JMBNunCwwxmw6mGVuY1g5z6D0WQPNG5iyiBTYgk6vMISctHsna9Tx6SekAtS Tura4Kq2Ak175/fkuARaKC/Yl9JlW/0KDd9KlD5QqXmmFcTdbCmJC7teXw3IKtv/yN aRfTJdCfD21xA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/10] PCI: of: Remove fwnode_dev_initialized() call for a PCI root bridge node Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Herve Codina" Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260909080114.591938-10-herve.codina@bootlin.com> References: <20260909080114.591938-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20260909080114.591938-10-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:15:44 +0000 Message-Id: <20260909081544.7E8E31F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > During the instantiation of devices described by a device-tree overlay > applied on a PCI device, devlink displays the following kind of debug > messages instead of creating the expected links: > 'Not linking xxxx - might never become dev' >=20 > Without those expected links, the device removal order cannot be > correct. >=20 > Those debug traces are printed by fw_devlink_create_devlink(). In our > use case, they are all printed because the supplier of the link has at > least one of its ancestor with its fwnode flag FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED > set. >=20 > The culprit ancestor is the PCI root bridge. >=20 > [ ... ] > are correctly created. >=20 > Fixes: 1f340724419e ("PCI: of: Create device tree PCI host bridge node") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909080114.5919= 38-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com?part=3D9