From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59EB41F8691; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 14:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790866068; cv=none; b=HM2K70hxRpvwNIw2QgHNHD8Kkj7d9dR3/Kyev4Ns9AN3oiQC/eXerLCs78lQyUoRsDnrekEBNOAbO/J461ZPDm4yyGho+dpEwTy3jt4X9/GQf46JLJ86RfzzlC6Q912bteOh2v6qt902lEL91Ei4Wt3LNb0s1L5a7x4yzztQZBU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790866068; c=relaxed/simple; bh=io+LVio3mhyXKo8GFpcBXyyMK/Nuv+u8nCXPhiUqK0A=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=LIwWv/ibW1fEzbhCwy643fhtaqGvZHbUeZDIe0D7OeZG1AkERWaND/FPlUAJ/cBWeMvGAsA6cEWXHG/amT05SaJO3yYkJhiN/4EVEG5K0DTw7NYEl+eTA0RUJsZ0NZu+2l7kKyn80/aKvAoKbQFSjdN4V3aq+ZTH0VFc56cCl+c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=I8R1WJih; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="I8R1WJih" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE52D1F000FF; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 14:47:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790866066; bh=YQWaMyV8inYUSdqjSJ38Qsy0u03OlWzoghsp63wRJjA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=I8R1WJihUOpZin+cYwChMobmTNXUrzKJ95ROaxH/5F8IabEAEvE8Joei9pirdcEFi ahAwFbOxURAE3CkN64nhxgJhw4w/z40qeUPxijL60DgQMWtZcL+oWBeBxm7JhxUlyI J0YbzVrqXXpAOzNqZNy+OPuAryYUq6susVirNeXOj3YHV2PouvJzBR6mCWWFNGO0Am 8TLlrvDH9l18Qs8WAQNNaBMtfjQ+A701m84OeXM3at5x7tUwKrDaUMcD3WTkirISmX u0W9+5E+bchhDMiMtUC7em36DVQGRovx40rWxU6E9VYhJf3BgRxdMP9R49UxL+oXOh 91SVl9gp64LKw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/10] PCI: of: Remove fwnode_dev_initialized() call for a PCI root bridge node Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Herve Codina" Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261001142815.277550-10-herve.codina@bootlin.com> References: <20261001142815.277550-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20261001142815.277550-10-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:47:46 +0000 Message-Id: <20261001144746.AE52D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > During the instantiation of devices described by a device-tree overlay > applied on a PCI device, devlink displays the following kind of debug > messages instead of creating the expected links: > 'Not linking xxxx - might never become dev' >=20 > Without those expected links, the device removal order cannot be > correct. >=20 > Those debug traces are printed by fw_devlink_create_devlink(). In our > use case, they are all printed because the supplier of the link has at > least one of its ancestor with its fwnode flag FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED > set. >=20 > The culprit ancestor is the PCI root bridge. >=20 > [ ... ] > are correctly created. >=20 > Fixes: 1f340724419e ("PCI: of: Create device tree PCI host bridge node") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001142815.2775= 50-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com?part=3D9