From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cxl: Add committed sysfs attribute to CXL decoder
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:23:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27f1581d-43ab-4ab9-b6ee-b591d82c30b3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <651c98472dfed_ae7e729495@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
On 10/3/23 15:40, Dan Williams wrote:
> Dave Jiang wrote:
>> This attribute allows cxl-cli to determine whether a decoder is
>> actively participating in a region. This is only a snapshot of the
>> state, and doesn't offer any protection or serialization against a
>> concurrent disable-region operation.
>
> A random thought occurred while realizing that the kernel uses a check
> of:
>
> port->commit_end != -1
>
> ...to determine that a given port (switch or endpoint) has committed
> decoders. If the goal here is to determine when it is safe to disable an
> entire memdev maybe it is better to check all of the decoders at once at
> the port level rather than one at a time. It is already the case that
> CXL prevents decoders from being committed out of order so what do you
> think of replacing decoderX.Y/committed with portX/decoders_committed,
> where it just does:
>
> down_read(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> sysfs_emit("%d\n", port->commit_end + 1);
> up_read(&cxl_region_rwsem);
>
> ...and cxl-cli aborts destructive processes on that attribute being
> non-zero.
Seems reasonable. I'll rework the patch and the cxl cli code.
>
> Is there any use case for userspace to check for individual decoders
> being committed? It can infer "decoder committed" from "decoder_id <
> decoders_commited".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 18:46 [PATCH v3] cxl: Add committed sysfs attribute to CXL decoder Dave Jiang
2023-09-28 1:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-03 22:40 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-03 23:23 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27f1581d-43ab-4ab9-b6ee-b591d82c30b3@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox